I am also +1 on having the automatic code style check. Plus it ensures the
project can compile too.

- Yifan

On Fri, Sep 26, 2025 at 11:04 AM Josh McKenzie <[email protected]> wrote:

> I'm a +1 to it. Easy to overlook, annoying when it bites you.
>
> Makes me think how much more intuitive this would be if we just used
> github PR's to merge in commits...
>
> But I don't want to derail this thread with that Pandora's Box. :) So
> let's shelve that for another discuss thread.
>
> On Fri, Sep 26, 2025, at 1:48 PM, Mick wrote:
>
> I'd like to propose the following patch:
>
> https://github.com/apache/cassandra/compare/trunk...thelastpickle:cassandra:mck/gha-lint
>
>
> It's a one-liner `check-code.sh` and is light and quick to run at ~6
> minutes.
>
> We are supposed to always run `ant check` (what check-code.sh does) before
> merging, but it's understandably an easy thing to forget now and again.
> Such a lightweight gh action will I believe prevent most of the breakages,
> since many of us push our dev branches to gh.  I'm not in favour of making
> it any heavier (that can be a seperate discussion for latter), nor at first
> trying to change/improve our checkstyle rules (that too can be done
> separately).
>
>
> Example result run here:
> https://github.com/thelastpickle/cassandra/actions/runs/17880689988/job/50847932781
>
>
> Any objections ?   (a jira ticket will be created)
>
> regards,
> Mick
>
>
>

Reply via email to