The vote passes with 6 +1s (+4 binding, +2 non-binding).

Thanks everyone!
Andy

On Tue, Oct 21, 2025 at 12:17 PM Nate McCall <[email protected]> wrote:

> +1
>
> On Sat, 18 Oct 2025 at 10:39 AM, Tolbert, Andy <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
>> Hi All,
>>
>> As we need a two more PMC votes, I'd like to extend the vote through
>> Tuesday Oct 21 at 21:30 UTC (4 days from now).
>>
>> In the meantime i'm working on coming up a Docker build and script with
>> something adjacent to what was done here for verifying cassandra builds (
>> https://github.com/apache/cassandra-builds/pull/32/files#diff-a636443cd5bfb43c9eddbf4ea4ce8546d63190b9326266245ab0068984fe59c1),
>> but for the java driver.  Hopefully will be able to get that going this
>> weekend.   I'll work to share something for that soon, and hopefully that
>> can help us establish some more confidence on our release artifacts!
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Andy
>>
>> On Thu, Oct 16, 2025 at 8:42 PM Bret McGuire <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>
>>>    +1 from me as well for the release overall.
>>>
>>>    Steps I took to validate are pretty similar to what was on Andy's
>>> list:
>>>
>>>
>>>    - Validated all checksums
>>>    - Ran a simple test app with dependencies from the staging Maven repo
>>>    - Ran a DataStax Jenkins job (to confirm all integration tests and
>>>    DSE functionality)
>>>
>>>
>>>    For the record: the following might be useful if you're
>>> Gradle-inclined:
>>>
>>> repositories {
>>>>
>>>>     mavenCentral()
>>>>
>>>>     maven {
>>>>
>>>>         url = uri("
>>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachecassandra-1423/
>>>> ")
>>>>
>>>>     }
>>>>
>>>> }
>>>>
>>>
>>>    - Bret -
>>>
>>> On Thu, Oct 16, 2025 at 2:42 PM Bret McGuire <[email protected]>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>>    +1 to the list Andy put out.  That's pretty much the same set of
>>>> steps I work through when I validate a given release.
>>>>
>>>>    With respect to the point raised by Abe, he and Andy and I spent
>>>> some time talking about this elsewhere.  The source tarball is correct; it
>>>> includes source for everything.  Abe did point out that the distribution
>>>> tarball in SVN doesn't have dependent JARs for all subprojects.  This is
>>>> something we can fix, but it's also probably a good start to a conversation
>>>> about what role we want the distribution tarball to play and whether we
>>>> need it at all anymore.  Further discussion is _definitely_ required there,
>>>> but the upshot is that no changes are required for this release; we can
>>>> move forward with the artifacts Andy has already uploaded.
>>>>
>>>>    Which in turn reminds me that _I_ need to validate this guy and give
>>>> a +1... on to that now!
>>>>
>>>>   - Bret -
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, Oct 16, 2025 at 9:42 AM Tolbert, Andy <[email protected]>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi Abe,
>>>>>
>>>>> Good catch! I assume you mean the main distribution (
>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cassandra/cassandra-java-driver/4.19.1/apache-cassandra-java-driver-4.19.1.tar.gz;
>>>>> which also includes src zips), it does look like there are some modules
>>>>> missing from the distribution pom that should probably be included;  It's
>>>>> likely that these modules were never added to the distribution build when
>>>>> they were introduced and no one has noticed until now.  Let me see if I 
>>>>> can
>>>>> fix that and make another go at this.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> https://github.com/apache/cassandra-java-driver/blob/4.x/distribution/pom.xml#L47-L69
>>>>>
>>>>> Just did a spot check and it looks like the source tar is including
>>>>> everything since it's just grabbing everything with exception to some
>>>>> dotfiles.
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>> Andy
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Thu, Oct 16, 2025 at 9:18 AM Abe Ratnofsky <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Agree it would be helpful to have a standardized script.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Maybe a noob question, but why do the source artifact distributions
>>>>>> only contain (core, query-builder, mapper-processor, mapper-runtime) and
>>>>>> not (metrics, guava, etc) which do have source files in-tree?
>>>>>>
>>>>>

Reply via email to