> On Oct 24, 2025, at 2:49 AM, Dinesh Joshi <[email protected]> wrote: > > Synchronous calls are not intended to exclude anybody. It will simply speed > up the process of building consensus among those who are interested in > joining such a call There’s dozens of voices of dissent at varying levels of intensity The outcome of the first round of discussion was “ok there’s no agreement to do this and there’s not even agreement about why people run forks or if it’s good that they maintain forks” And then we’re back pushing for consensus. There’s no consensus here to speed up.
- Re: [DISCUSS] Understanding fork motivations (backpor... Alex Petrov
- Re: [DISCUSS] Understanding fork motivations (backpor... Isaac Reath
- Re: [DISCUSS] Understanding fork motivations (ba... C. Scott Andreas
- Re: [DISCUSS] Understanding fork motivations... Josh McKenzie
- Re: [DISCUSS] Understanding fork motivat... Štefan Miklošovič
- Re: [DISCUSS] Understanding fork mot... Josh McKenzie
- Re: [DISCUSS] Understanding for... Jon Haddad
- Re: [DISCUSS] Understanding... Dinesh Joshi
- Re: [DISCUSS] Understanding... scott
- Re: [DISCUSS] Understanding... Dinesh Joshi
- Re: [DISCUSS] Understanding... Jeff Jirsa
- Re: [DISCUSS] Understanding... Mick
- Re: [DISCUSS] Understanding... Josh McKenzie
- Re: [DISCUSS] Understanding... Alex Petrov
- Re: [DISCUSS] Understanding... Dinesh Joshi
- Re: [DISCUSS] Understanding... Dinesh Joshi
- Re: [DISCUSS] Understanding... Jaydeep Chovatia
- Re: [DISCUSS] Understanding... Dinesh Joshi
- Re: [DISCUSS] Understanding... Jaydeep Chovatia
- Re: [DISCUSS] Understanding... Aleksey Yeshchenko
- Re: [DISCUSS] Understanding... Aleksey Yeshchenko
