On Fri, Oct 24, 2025 at 2:44 AM Jeff Jirsa <[email protected]> wrote:
> The outcome of the first round of discussion was “ok there’s no agreement > to do this and there’s not even agreement about why people run forks or if > it’s good that they maintain forks” > Well I guess we're talking about two different things here and it is totally my fault. Let me clarify. I am talking about the idea of backports. My general reading of both threads is that we all agree to a varying degree that backports are valuable. This is where I believe there is general agreement. If that is not the case, please point it out and I will happily stand corrected. > And then we’re back pushing for consensus. > > There’s no consensus here to speed up. > Maybe it is poor choice of words but my aim here was to help build shared understanding of the problem so we can talk about possible paths to a solution. Dinesh
