Hi Werner,

yeah, we're trying to move away from JDK 1.2 (WAS 4.0) as quickly as possible.

I will plug Castor JD0 0.9.7 and 0.9.9 into our apps as soon as possible.


Tim

+++
Tim Telcik
Technical Application Architect
Business Systems Delivery
Information Technology Services, HBF, Inc.
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tel: 9214 6744    Fax: 9214 6779




"Werner Guttmann" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

12/05/2005 03:39 PM

Please respond to
[email protected]

To
<[email protected]>
cc
Subject
RE: [castor-dev] Castor and JDK 1.2





Hi Tim,

ideally, less than two months, if possible. And I guess you would want to use upcoming releases like 0.9.7 or 0.9.9 on JDK 1.2, correct ?

Regards
Werner

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, May 12, 2005 4:38 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [castor-dev] Castor and JDK 1.2



Hi Werner & Co.

we are still using JDK 1.2 as part of WebSphere Application Server 4.0.

There is work underway here to migrate to WebSphere Application Server 5.1 which uses JDK 1.3. IBM no longer supports WAS 4.0, hence the move.

I suspect we will be using WAS 4 (and JDK 1.2) for the next 3 months (6 months at the worst) during the transition.

What time frame are you thinking of for migrating from JDK 1.2 to 1.3 ?


Thanks.

Tim.

+++
Tim Telcik
Technical Application Architect
Business Systems Delivery
Information Technology Services, HBF, Inc.
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tel: 9214 6744    Fax: 9214 6779




"Werner Guttmann" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
12/05/2005 03:00 AM Please respond to
[email protected]

To"[email protected]" <[email protected]>, "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
cc
Subject[castor-dev] Castor and JDK 1.2







Hi,

as we are trying to make some decisions with regards to future features, we'd be interested to learn if there's still users out
there that require Castor (JDO) to work with JDK 1.2. If that's the case, can you please come forward and indicate to us why
this would still be required ? If I don't hear from anybody within a couple of days, we'll assume that we can move to JDK 1.3 as
the least common denominator.

Thanks
Werner









============================================================
HBF Health Funds Inc. a registered organisation under the National Health Act
HBF Insurance Pty Ltd ACN  009 268 277
This email is a confidential communication intended only for the named Addressee(s). If you are not that person any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of this email or the information in it is prohibited. Please notify us immediately by telephone, (+61) 08 9265 6111 or return email and delete this email.






============================================================
HBF Health Funds Inc. a registered organisation under the National Health Act
HBF Insurance Pty Ltd ACN  009 268 277
This email is a confidential communication intended only for the named Addressee(s). If you are not that person any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of this email or the information in it is prohibited. Please notify us immediately by telephone, (+61) 08 9265 6111 or return email and delete this email.

Reply via email to