Ok, it's all a bit random...
1) You're using access="read-only".
2) You're then modifying the CounterType object, which is defined in
the castor mapping for the DB as being a dependent object of a read-
only object?
Please describe what you're doing a little more - because the
scenario you're describing, yes, probably does fail. :) Like the
other one, this might be a bug, or it might be misuse - I can't tell
which.
-------------------------------------------------
If you wish to unsubscribe from this list, please
send an empty message to the following address:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-------------------------------------------------
