All,
I just updated the Castor support for
OpenEJB. In doing so, I have now realized that Castor resolves
the mapping files referenced in the database file a little
differently. In 0.9.5.3, we would put
"META-INF/cmp.or-mapping.xml" as the mapping file and it was properly
loaded. In Castor 0.9.9M2, it tries to load
"META-INF/META-INF/cmp.or-mapping.xml". Now...I've got my own
opinion about this but is it safe to say that Castor uses the location
of the database file as the base of where to build relative paths to
the mapping files? This is the only way I can see this not being a
bug. If it's a bug, let me know and I'll file a Jira.
--
Take care,
Jeremy
- [castor-dev] [JDO] Mapping File Path Resolution Jeremy Whitlock
- Re: [castor-dev] [JDO] Mapping File Path Resolution Bruce Snyder
- Re: [castor-dev] [JDO] Mapping File Path Resolution Ralf Joachim
- Re: [castor-dev] [JDO] Mapping File Path Resoluti... Jeremy Whitlock
- Re: [castor-dev] [JDO] Mapping File Path Resoluti... Bruce Snyder
- Re: [castor-dev] [JDO] Mapping File Path Reso... Jeremy Whitlock
- RE: [castor-dev] [JDO] Mapping File Path Resolution Werner Guttmann

