Hi Jeremy, you have to options to specify mapping in jdo-conf.xml/database.xml.
1. you can specify an absolute path 2. with relative path it is interpreted to be relative to the position of the jdo-conf.xml/database.xml file. But there is a restiction if the configuartion files are in jars, they need to be in the same jar file in this case. Having said that I'm not sure if Bruce is right and this is a bug as the behaviour to load mapping files have changed with 0.9.6. Regards Ralf Jeremy Whitlock schrieb: > All, > I just updated the Castor support for OpenEJB. In doing so, I have > now realized that Castor resolves the mapping files referenced in the > database file a little differently. In 0.9.5.3 <http://0.9.5.3>, we > would put "META-INF/cmp.or-mapping.xml" as the mapping file and it was > properly loaded. In Castor 0.9.9M2, it tries to load > "META-INF/META-INF/cmp.or-mapping.xml". Now...I've got my own opinion > about this but is it safe to say that Castor uses the location of the > database file as the base of where to build relative paths to the > mapping files? This is the only way I can see this not being a bug. If > it's a bug, let me know and I'll file a Jira. > > -- > Take care, > Jeremy ------------------------------------------------- If you wish to unsubscribe from this list, please send an empty message to the following address: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -------------------------------------------------
