Jean T. Anderson wrote: > Michael Gentry wrote: > ... > >>Mike K. did raise an interesting point about if Cayenne Modeler starts >>using Derby instead of HSQL, what does that mean for us? Would we >>only need the BIS/etc if we run the preferences DB with encryption (I >>can't imagine we would -- no reason to)? > > And the word from legal-discuss [1] is any project that includes derby > (or any other Apache product listed at > http://www.apache.org/licenses/exports/), must also do the BIS > notification.
and if you only use Derby and don't include source or jars, no notification is needed: http://tinyurl.com/2qu6eq http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/www-legal-discuss/200702.mbox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] -jean > It doesn't matter if you don't use derby's encryption capability -- the > capability is still there in the derby jar Cayenne includes. > > fortunately doing the BIS notification itself turns out to actually be > straight forward -- imho the hard part has been to understand if you > need to do it or not. The steps to follow are outlined at > http://www.apache.org/dev/crypto.html. > > -jean > > > [1] http://tinyurl.com/yq75r6 > http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/www-legal-discuss/200702.mbox/[EMAIL > PROTECTED]
