Michael Gentry wrote: > Well, for Cayenne Modeler to run standalone using Derby (embedded, > just like we use HSQL), we would need to include the Derby jar.
Ok. The bis notification isn't a big deal. I'm happy to help with it. -jean > Thanks, > > /dev/mrg > > > On 2/27/07, Jean T. Anderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Michael Gentry wrote: >> > To re-hash -- but not ROT-13 :-) -- this subject again, did someone >> > send anything to the legal mailing list? If not, I can subscribe, and >> > send the question, along with a link to this thread. >> > >> > I did see that Jean said if we switch CM to use Derby instead of HSQL, >> > we'll need the BIS, which is kind of interesting, too. >> >> You only need to include derby in the bis notification if you commit >> derby source/jars to the svn repo or include derby source/jars in the >> release. If you just use derby -- instructing users to download and >> install it -- you don't need to include it in the bis notification. >> >> If you find that you need to include it in the bis notification, I'll be >> happy to help cayenne understand how to do that. It turns out to not be >> much of a big deal, just process to follow. >> >> -jean >> >> > Maybe when I'm too brain-dead at work today I can get something done >> > here. (When having to do 20 pages of documentation for a 1 line >> > configuration file change, my brain tends to want to go elsewhere...) >> > >> > Thanks, >> > >> > /dev/mrg >> >>
