Sounds good. We might still want to change the naming convention for consistency down the road, but good to hear there's no urgency.
Andrus On Jun 28, 2011, at 2:16 PM, Eshan Sudharaka wrote: > Hi , > I am sorry. I found a way to check the content of the XML files (currently > root element) and if it is cayenne project file then load cayenne icon in > eclipse. So no need of changing file naming conventions. > > On Sun, Jun 26, 2011 at 8:34 PM, Andrus Adamchik > <[email protected]>wrote: > >> >> On Jun 26, 2011, at 5:45 PM, Andrus Adamchik wrote: >> >>> However... nothing prevents us from changing the naming convention again. >> After all 3.1 is not final yet (not even Beta). We might as well adopt >> another "double extension": >>> >>> Main project file: xyz.cayenne.xml >>> DataMap file: xyz.map.xml >>> >>> This will ensure both types of files follow a similar convention, and >> make them Eclipse-friendly. >> >> Also the beauty of Cayenne 3.1 is that the name of the project file is >> specified explicitly when the runtime is started, so the file can really be >> called anything (doesn't even have to have .xml extension). So the focus of >> this discussion is the tools (CayenneModeler, Eclipse, etc..), not the >> runtime. >> >> Andrus >> >> > > > -- > *~Thanks & Regards~* > *** > * > P.A.Eshan Sudharaka > Dept of Computer Science and Engineering > University of Moratuwa > Sri Lanka > http://esudharaka.blogspot.com/
