If we want it to be published on the website - then yes. I am not sure we do. But I won’t object to it either.
Andrus On Jun 16, 2014, at 10:59 AM, Aristedes Maniatis <[email protected]> wrote: > Should it be in svn as part of our website? That makes some sense. > > Ari > > > On 16/06/2014 4:57pm, Andrus Adamchik wrote: >> Cool. I’ll see what we need to do to pull it down. And let’s plan to write >> the next report in SVN (or maybe we should request a new Git repo for it?) >> >> Andrus >> >> On Jun 13, 2014, at 4:39 PM, Michael Gentry <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Welcome Andrus. We talked about ditching the Wiki the previous board >>> report and I'm OK with that. As your screenshot shows, it looks pretty >>> awful. >>> >>> mrg >>> >>> >>> On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 1:07 PM, Andrus Adamchik <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> Thanks Mike for preparing the report. I edited the Git note and will submit >>> the report in a few minutes. >>> >>> Going forward, I think we should do away with our wiki, and check reports >>> to SVN as text files. The wiki rendering is broken, and there’s really no >>> reason to work on fixing it.Andrus >>> >>> >>> >>> On Jun 9, 2014, at 6:20 PM, Michael Gentry <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> Please review/comment: >>>> >>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CAY/Board+Report+June+2014 >>>> >>>> My biggest question was about the Git migration. >>>> >>>> Thanks, >>>> >>>> mrg >>> >>> >> > > -- > --------------------------> > Aristedes Maniatis > GPG fingerprint CBFB 84B4 738D 4E87 5E5C 5EFA EF6A 7D2E 3E49 102A >
