I'm down with a GD, too.
On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 2:56 PM, Andrus Adamchik <and...@objectstyle.org> wrote: > FWIW, we can even use GoogleDocs and destroy them after report submission > :) > > On Sep 3, 2014, at 9:45 PM, Andrus Adamchik <and...@objectstyle.org> > wrote: > > > Yeah :-/ > > > > ~: svn mkdir http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/cayenne/board-reports -m > "board reports" > > svn: E175013: POST of '/repos/asf/!svn/me': 403 Forbidden ( > http://svn.apache.org) > > > > I know that http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/cayenne/site/ is writable - > that's our website, and CMS doesn't even work with Git. I assumed other > folders except for main are available for writing. I was wrong. > > > > I will probably just ask Infra to create a separate Git repo for > reports. Maybe we call it "cayenne-pmc" just in case we need to place > something there that is not a board report in the future. > > > > For now I see no problem if we collaborate on the report using email and > this list. > > > > Andrus > > > > > > On Sep 3, 2014, at 9:24 PM, Michael Gentry <mgen...@masslight.net> > wrote: > > > >> Well, according to our website: > >> > >> "For archival purposes SVN repository is still available in a read-only > >> mode" > >> > >> And when I just tried to add the reports to SVN, I received: > >> > >> svn: Commit failed (details follow): > >> svn: Server sent unexpected return value (403 Forbidden) in response to > >> MKACTIVITY request for > >> '/repos/asf/!svn/act/be340dff-489e-479c-9c44-4367a994a635' > >> > >> > >> So, I'm guessing SVN really is read-only? > >> > >> mrg > >> > >> > >> On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 5:11 AM, Andrus Adamchik <and...@objectstyle.org > > > >> wrote: > >> > >>> Mike, > >>> > >>> Sorry, I misunderstood you. I thought you were going to put it at the > >>> top-level of SVN, not Git. > >>> > >>> With Git we have a different repository model. Instead of one huge SVN > >>> tree that contains everything from the source code to sandbox to site > >>> pages, Git is normally split into smaller repos. So > >>> https://github.com/apache/cayenne corresponds to the former “main” > folder > >>> under http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/cayenne/ . > >>> > >>> My suggestion would be to move board-reports to SVN. > >>> > >>> What do you think? > >>> > >>> Andrus > >>> > >>> On Sep 3, 2014, at 1:10 AM, Michael Gentry <mgen...@masslight.net> > wrote: > >>> > >>>> Put the draft at board-reports/2014-09.md if anyone wants to review > >>> it. It > >>>> is in Markdown format, so it should render well on GitHub, too. > >>>> > >>>> I also added the previous two (March and June), but wasn't planning on > >>>> going back through my emails to add anything before 2014 unless anyone > >>>> objects. > >>>> > >>>> Thanks, > >>>> > >>>> mrg > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> On Tue, Sep 2, 2014 at 10:40 AM, Michael Gentry < > mgen...@masslight.net> > >>>> wrote: > >>>> > >>>>> OK, I'll start on September's there. Thanks! > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> On Tue, Sep 2, 2014 at 10:24 AM, Andrus Adamchik < > >>> and...@objectstyle.org> > >>>>> wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>>>> how about "board-reports" at the top level? > >>>>>> > >>>>>> I’d say go for it. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> On Sep 2, 2014, at 5:16 PM, Michael Gentry <mgen...@masslight.net> > >>> wrote: > >>>>>> > >>>>>>> Was there a specific location in the repo created to put board > >>>>>> reports? If > >>>>>>> not, how about "board-reports" at the top level? > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Thanks, > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> mrg > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> On Mon, Jun 16, 2014 at 4:05 AM, Andrus Adamchik < > >>>>>> and...@objectstyle.org> > >>>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> If we want it to be published on the website - then yes. I am not > >>> sure > >>>>>> we > >>>>>>>> do. But I won’t object to it either. > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> Andrus > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> On Jun 16, 2014, at 10:59 AM, Aristedes Maniatis < > a...@maniatis.org> > >>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> Should it be in svn as part of our website? That makes some > sense. > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> Ari > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> On 16/06/2014 4:57pm, Andrus Adamchik wrote: > >>>>>>>>>> Cool. I’ll see what we need to do to pull it down. And let’s > plan > >>> to > >>>>>>>> write the next report in SVN (or maybe we should request a new Git > >>>>>> repo for > >>>>>>>> it?) > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> Andrus > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> On Jun 13, 2014, at 4:39 PM, Michael Gentry < > mgen...@masslight.net > >>>> > >>>>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> Welcome Andrus. We talked about ditching the Wiki the previous > >>>>>> board > >>>>>>>> report and I'm OK with that. As your screenshot shows, it looks > >>> pretty > >>>>>>>> awful. > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> mrg > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 1:07 PM, Andrus Adamchik < > >>>>>>>> and...@objectstyle.org> wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>> Thanks Mike for preparing the report. I edited the Git note and > >>> will > >>>>>>>> submit the report in a few minutes. > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> Going forward, I think we should do away with our wiki, and > check > >>>>>>>> reports to SVN as text files. The wiki rendering is broken, and > >>> there’s > >>>>>>>> really no reason to work on fixing it.Andrus > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> On Jun 9, 2014, at 6:20 PM, Michael Gentry < > mgen...@masslight.net > >>>> > >>>>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> Please review/comment: > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CAY/Board+Report+June+2014 > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> My biggest question was about the Git migration. > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks, > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> mrg > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> -- > >>>>>>>>> --------------------------> > >>>>>>>>> Aristedes Maniatis > >>>>>>>>> GPG fingerprint CBFB 84B4 738D 4E87 5E5C 5EFA EF6A 7D2E 3E49 > 102A > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>> > >>> > >>> > > > > > >
