The errors you posted seem to be network errors. I just rebuilt again without problems.
> uname -a Linux linux-4eqv.site 3.16.7-7-desktop #1 SMP PREEMPT Wed Dec 17 18:00:44 UTC 2014 (762f27a) x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux [Opensuse 13.2] > java -version openjdk version "1.8.0_40" OpenJDK Runtime Environment (build 1.8.0_40-b10) OpenJDK 64-Bit Server VM (build 25.40-b14, mixed mode) Oops! My system upgrade on Feb 23rd apparently jumped me from Java 1.6 to 1.8. I did not notice that. When I build with Java 1.7 > java -version java version "1.7.0_75" OpenJDK Runtime Environment (IcedTea 2.5.4) (suse-4.1-x86_64) OpenJDK 64-Bit Server VM (build 24.75-b04, mixed mode) I get: Tests in error: testNewDataMapImport(org.apache.cayenne.tools.dbimport.DbImportActionTest) Tests run: 76, Failures: 0, Errors: 1, Skipped: 0 [INFO] ------------------------------------------------------------------------ [INFO] Reactor Summary: [INFO] [INFO] Cayenne ........................................... SUCCESS [3.069s] [INFO] Cayenne Build Tools Parent ........................ SUCCESS [0.135s] [INFO] Cayenne License and Notice Bundle ................. SUCCESS [7.748s] [INFO] Common Unit Test Utilities ........................ SUCCESS [3.225s] [INFO] Cayenne Code Checkers ............................. SUCCESS [0.569s] [INFO] Cayenne Dependency Injection Container ............ SUCCESS [48.682s] [INFO] Cayenne Server .................................... SUCCESS [4:20.241s] [INFO] Cayenne ROP Client ................................ SUCCESS [51.797s] [INFO] Cayenne Project ................................... SUCCESS [9.432s] [INFO] Cayenne Tools ..................................... FAILURE [27.403s] [INFO] Cayenne Lifecycle Utilities ....................... SKIPPED So I got farther than you did, but not all the way. On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 12:03 PM, Michael Gentry <mgen...@masslight.net> wrote: > Yeah, I know Jenkins is building on Linux, so I'm confused as to why I'm > having this issue, but you are probably right that it is specific to my > network, although there is nothing complex or unusual about my network. > > > On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 11:58 AM, Andrus Adamchik <and...@objectstyle.org> > wrote: > >> BTW, our Jenkins builds are all Linux. >> >> The error is likely about JGroups breaking in your network environment >> (not related to Cayenne, but of course very annoying). So hopefully it >> works on OS X. >> >> Andrus >> >> > On Mar 10, 2015, at 6:49 PM, Michael Gentry <mgen...@masslight.net> >> wrote: >> > >> > I've still been unable to build on Linux, even with the changes Andrus >> > suggested. I can try Mac OS X tonight, but even if it builds there, I'm >> > concerned about the failure on Linux until I can figure it out. >> > >> > mrg >> > >> > >> > On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 11:37 AM, Mike Kienenberger <mkien...@gmail.com> >> > wrote: >> > >> >> Hey guys, >> >> >> >> We're still missing one more binding vote and it's been 12 days. >> >> >> >> On Sun, Mar 8, 2015 at 4:26 PM, Andrus Adamchik <and...@objectstyle.org >> > >> >> wrote: >> >>> Googling shows that putting '-Djava.net.preferIPv4Stack=true' might >> >> help. We mention that in the dev guide actually, and just recently I was >> >> wondering which one of the tests actually requires IPv4 vs IPv6 :) >> >>> >> >>> http://cayenne.apache.org/dev/building-cayenne.html >> >>> >> >>> Andrus >> >>> >> >>>> On Mar 6, 2015, at 9:50 PM, Michael Gentry <mgen...@masslight.net> >> >> wrote: >> >>>> >> >>>> I'm consistently getting this test failure when trying to build: >> >>>> >> >>>> Tests in error: >> >>>> DataRowStoreIT.testConstructorWithProperties:63 ยป CayenneRuntime >> >>>> [v.4.0.M2 Mar... >> >>>> >> >>>> Tests run: 1456, Failures: 0, Errors: 1, Skipped: 0 >> >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> [INFO] Reactor Summary: >> >>>> [INFO] >> >>>> [INFO] Cayenne ........................................... SUCCESS >> >> [1.236s] >> >>>> [INFO] Cayenne Build Tools Parent ........................ SUCCESS >> >> [0.021s] >> >>>> [INFO] Cayenne License and Notice Bundle ................. SUCCESS >> >> [2.770s] >> >>>> [INFO] Common Unit Test Utilities ........................ SUCCESS >> >> [2.040s] >> >>>> [INFO] Cayenne Code Checkers ............................. SUCCESS >> >> [0.173s] >> >>>> [INFO] Cayenne Dependency Injection Container ............ SUCCESS >> >> [15.565s] >> >>>> [INFO] Cayenne Server .................................... FAILURE >> >>>> [3:10.456s] >> >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> >> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- >> >>>> Test set: org.apache.cayenne.access.DataRowStoreIT >> >>>> >> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- >> >>>> Tests run: 4, Failures: 0, Errors: 1, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.244 >> >> sec >> >>>> <<< FAILURE! - in org.apache.cayenne.access.DataRowStoreIT >> >>>> >> testConstructorWithProperties(org.apache.cayenne.access.DataRowStoreIT) >> >>>> Time elapsed: 0.172 sec <<< ERROR! >> >>>> org.apache.cayenne.CayenneRuntimeException: [v.4.0.M2 Mar 06 2015 >> >> 13:39:49] >> >>>> Error initializing DataRowStore. >> >>>> at org.jgroups.JChannel.connect(JChannel.java:328) >> >>>> at >> >>>> >> >> >> org.apache.cayenne.event.JavaGroupsBridge.startupExternal(JavaGroupsBridge.java:130) >> >>>> at >> org.apache.cayenne.event.EventBridge.startup(EventBridge.java:245) >> >>>> at >> org.apache.cayenne.event.EventBridge.startup(EventBridge.java:193) >> >>>> at >> org.apache.cayenne.event.EventBridge.startup(EventBridge.java:178) >> >>>> at >> >>>> >> >> >> org.apache.cayenne.access.DataRowStore.startListeners(DataRowStore.java:613) >> >>>> at >> >>>> >> >> >> org.apache.cayenne.access.DataRowStore.initWithProperties(DataRowStore.java:182) >> >>>> at >> >> org.apache.cayenne.access.DataRowStore.<init>(DataRowStore.java:107) >> >>>> at >> >>>> >> >> >> org.apache.cayenne.access.DataRowStoreIT.testConstructorWithProperties(DataRowStoreIT.java:63) >> >>>> ... >> >>>> [DownHandler (UDP)] INFO org.jgroups.protocols.UDP - unicast sockets >> >> will >> >>>> use interface 127.0.1.1 >> >>>> [main] ERROR org.jgroups.JChannel - exception: java.lang.Exception: >> >>>> exception caused by UDP.start(): java.net.SocketException: bad >> argument >> >> for >> >>>> IP_MULTICAST_IF: address not bound to any interface >> >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> mrg:~$ uname -a >> >>>> Linux 3.13.0-46-generic #77-Ubuntu SMP Mon Mar 2 18:26:13 UTC 2015 >> i686 >> >>>> i686 i686 GNU/Linux >> >>>> mrg:~$ java -version >> >>>> java version "1.7.0_75" >> >>>> OpenJDK Runtime Environment (IcedTea 2.5.4) (7u75-2.5.4-1~trusty1) >> >>>> OpenJDK Server VM (build 24.75-b04, mixed mode) >> >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> Any suggestions? >> >>>> >> >>>> Thanks, >> >>>> >> >>>> mrg >> >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> On Sat, Feb 28, 2015 at 4:48 AM, Andrus Adamchik < >> >> and...@objectstyle.org> >> >>>> wrote: >> >>>> >> >>>>> >> >>>>>> On Feb 26, 2015, at 12:41 PM, Alex Kolonitsky < >> >>>>> akolonit...@objectstyle.com> wrote: >> >>>>>> >> >>>>>> Hi All, >> >>>>>> I've prepared 4.0.M2 artifacts for voting again, I hope this time >> >>>>> everything will be fine. >> >>>>>> >> >>>>>> Maven artifacts: >> >>>>> >> >> >> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachecayenne-1005 < >> >>>>> >> >> >> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachecayenne-1005> >> >>>>>> Assemblies: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cayenne/4.0.M2/ >> < >> >>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cayenne/4.0.M2/> >> >>>>>> >> >>>>>> Please evaluate and cast your votes. >> >>>>>> >> >>>>>> Regards, >> >>>>>> Alex Kolonitsky. >> >>>>> >> >>>>> +1 from me. >> >>>>> >> >>>>> >> >>>>> 1. rat.sh - no complaints >> >>>>> (noticed .idea/ directory at the root of the source archive. Not a >> show >> >>>>> stopper for the release, but let's add it to assembly excludes for >> the >> >>>>> future) >> >>>>> 2. checksums - match >> >>>>> 3. signatures - match >> >>>>> 4. Source builds (mvn verify) >> >>>>> 5. Modeler OS X, Windows, Generic versions all start fine >> >>>>> 6. Random poking through the structure of the binary assemblies >> doesn't >> >>>>> show anything abnormal. >> >>>>> >> >>>>> and thanks to Mike for providing a detailed release evaluation >> script. >> >>>>> >> >>>>> Andrus >> >>> >> >> >> >>
