> Just a little thing (unrelated to website design), the 3.1.2 is out since a 
> while, but the release notes says that is not yet released

Yeah, that's an artifact of the release process workflow. When we create a Git 
tag, we don't yet know the official release date which would happen a week or 
two in the future. Of course the date eventually added to the branch: 
https://github.com/apache/cayenne/blob/STABLE-3.1/docs/doc/src/main/resources/RELEASE-NOTES.txt
 . Other branches have the same issue. 

I guess we can use the tag date as the release date in the RELEASE-NOTES and 
add this step to the release guide (?)

Andrus



> On Jan 22, 2018, at 1:47 PM, Amedeo Mantica <amedeomant...@me.com> wrote:
> 
> really cool!
> 
> Congrats
> 
> Just a little thing (unrelated to website design), the 3.1.2 is out since a 
> while, but the release notes says that is not yet released
> 
> Amedeo
> 
>> On 22 Jan 2018, at 11:45, Malcolm Edgar <malcolm.ed...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> 
>> The sign looks awsome, well done.
>> 
>> Possible tagline: "A data oriented Java ORM that people love"
>> 
>> regards Malcolm
>> 
>> On Mon, Jan 22, 2018 at 6:50 PM, Nikita Timofeev <ntimof...@objectstyle.com>
>> wrote:
>> 
>>> Congratulations to all, new site is live now at cayenne.apache.org :)
>>> Thanks for all your help and ideas!
>>> 
>>> P.S. Here is instruction how to work with the new site:
>>> https://cayenne.apache.org/dev/cms-guide.html
>>> 
>>> On Wed, Jan 17, 2018 at 6:01 PM, Andrus Adamchik <and...@objectstyle.org>
>>> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>>> On Jan 15, 2018, at 5:42 PM, Michael Gentry <blackn...@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>>> Can we fold the Apache branding into the red
>>>> 
>>>> [...]
>>>> 
>>>>> The dark bar is taking up a lot of space without adding a lot of value.
>>>> 
>>>> I'd say it is in a good place. Underscoring that Cayenne is an Apache
>>> subproject, but isolating Foundation-related concerns in its own visual
>>> area. I'd keep it.
>>>> 
>>>>> bar and then get rid of the redundant "Apache Cayenne" text?
>>>> 
>>>> +1
>>>> 
>>>> Andrus
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> --
>>> Best regards,
>>> Nikita Timofeev
>>> 
> 

Reply via email to