Yes, I agree. I tried hard a few years ago to set up Jenkins as best I
could to make it reliable. But travis is both easier and more consistent.
Ari
On 25/4/18 5:07pm, Andrus Adamchik wrote:
I guess no replies indicates lazy consensus. Going to proceed with it when I
have spare moment.
Andrus
On Apr 11, 2018, at 4:33 PM, Andrus Adamchik <[email protected]> wrote:
How about we turn off Jenkins CI? Whatever we tried, we could never achieve
stable builds there. Not sure if that's the diversity of the ASF CI runner
configurations, shared ~/.m2 directory or something else. To me Jenkins results
now are just noise that I never bother to investigate anymore.
Travis [1] seems to be much more stable, and runs tests on many more DBs
anyways.
Thoughts?
Andrus
[1] https://travis-ci.org/apache/cayenne/builds
[2] https://travis-ci.org/apache/cayenne/builds/365094572
