All Cayenne-related configs are deleted from Jenkins. I guess we might setup 3.1 branch to build on Travis (though maybe not - there may still be random failures on 3.1 due to the imperfect test DB cleanup facilities).
Andrus > On Apr 25, 2018, at 2:00 PM, Aristedes Maniatis <[email protected]> wrote: > > Yes, I agree. I tried hard a few years ago to set up Jenkins as best I could > to make it reliable. But travis is both easier and more consistent. > > Ari > > On 25/4/18 5:07pm, Andrus Adamchik wrote: >> I guess no replies indicates lazy consensus. Going to proceed with it when I >> have spare moment. >> >> Andrus >> >> >>> On Apr 11, 2018, at 4:33 PM, Andrus Adamchik <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> How about we turn off Jenkins CI? Whatever we tried, we could never achieve >>> stable builds there. Not sure if that's the diversity of the ASF CI runner >>> configurations, shared ~/.m2 directory or something else. To me Jenkins >>> results now are just noise that I never bother to investigate anymore. >>> >>> Travis [1] seems to be much more stable, and runs tests on many more DBs >>> anyways. >>> >>> Thoughts? >>> >>> Andrus >>> >>> >>> [1] https://travis-ci.org/apache/cayenne/builds >>> [2] https://travis-ci.org/apache/cayenne/builds/365094572
