Good catch! Def something we'd like to change in 4.3/5.0
> On May 31, 2022, at 11:14 AM, Hugi Thordarson <h...@godurkodi.is> wrote:
>
> Hi Nikita,
>
> That's cool! I've unfortunately had little opportunity to check out 4.2
> lately (still stuck with a mutilated 4.1 for…reasons) but incidentally
> started looking at a migration last weekend.
>
> I absolutely love the typed properties—one quick observation is that there's
> a "DateProperty" that represents both date and a time. It feels like it would
> more appropriately called "DateTimeProperty", leaving room for a later actual
> "DateProperty" (date only) and even a "TimeProperty" (time only), to properly
> represent the types and align with the corresponding java.time types/class
> names. The time functions of DateProperty won't apply do a DATE field.
>
> API changes like this are probably too late at this beta stage (shame on me
> for being so late to the 4.2 party) but I still thought I'd mention it since
> it's an API that can somewhat reverberate into the future.
>
> Cheers,
> - hugi
>
>
>
>> On 31 May 2022, at 08:31, Nikita Timofeev <ntimof...@objectstyle.com> wrote:
>>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Looks like it's a good time for the 4.2.RC1 version. No serious
>> problems were found in B1 and not much happening with 4.2 right now.
>> So, if there's nothing I'm missing I'll start the release process this week.
>>
>> --
>> Best regards,
>> Nikita Timofeev
>
