Hello Jiaming, I confirm my agreement with Proposal Option 3 as well. It’s reassuring to know that it will work well with both Java and native clients and allow for easier future upgrades.
Thanks, Ethan Feng rexxiong <[email protected]> 于2024年10月28日周一 12:05写道： > > Thank you, Jiamin. > > After discussing offline, I personally prefer Proposal Option 3, as it is > compatible with both Java and native clients and is more upgrade-friendly. > > Thanks, > Jiashu Xiong > > Jiaming Xie <[email protected]> 于2024年10月24日周四 12:15写道： > > > Hi all, > > > > According to the community's discussion, I updated the CIP on > > supporting CppClient in Celeborn, > > and in the latest design, the compatibility in Java side would not be > > affected. > > The update draft is > > > > https://docs.google.com/document/d/1EMx1fryZx0gKd4Q32uQEi1835kNhB92yRjteILQpijg/edit?usp=sharing > > . > > > > Any suggestion is welcome. > > > > Regards, > > Jiaming Xie > >
