Sigs and MD5s verify. Tests run clean. +1 from me!

------------------

  Verifying MD5s

------------------


** NOTE ** Using md5deep with -M ...

The files that match a known MD5 will be displayed.

If you don't see an RC artifact something is wrong with the MD5


Verifying MD5s ...

132232fde36b527e761d21b82ad4173a
/Users/mjjoyce/Coding/Climate/artifact_staging/dev_dist/1.0.0_rc1/climate-1.0.0-rc1.tgz

c5ab7724968602d829803b36f895dd88
/Users/mjjoyce/Coding/Climate/artifact_staging/dev_dist/1.0.0_rc1/climate-1.0.0-rc1.zip


------------------------

  Verifying Signatures

------------------------

Verifying Signature for file climate-1.0.0-rc1.tgz.asc

gpg: Signature made Thu Sep  3 12:56:34 2015 PDT using RSA key ID 48BAEBF6

gpg: Good signature from "Lewis John McGibbney (CODE SIGNING KEY) <
lewi...@apache.org>"

gpg: WARNING: This key is not certified with a trusted signature!

gpg:          There is no indication that the signature belongs to the
owner.

Primary key fingerprint: DB7B 5199 121C 08A5 C8F4  052B 3A47 17F0 48BA EBF6

Verifying Signature for file climate-1.0.0-rc1.zip.asc

gpg: Signature made Thu Sep  3 12:57:09 2015 PDT using RSA key ID 48BAEBF6

gpg: Good signature from "Lewis John McGibbney (CODE SIGNING KEY) <
lewi...@apache.org>"

gpg: WARNING: This key is not certified with a trusted signature!

gpg:          There is no indication that the signature belongs to the
owner.

Primary key fingerprint: DB7B 5199 121C 08A5 C8F4  052B 3A47 17F0 48BA EBF6


-- Jimmy

On Thu, Sep 3, 2015 at 1:02 PM, Lewis John Mcgibbney <
lewis.mcgibb...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> The second release candidate for Apache Open Climate Workbench 1.0.0 is now
> available.
>
> The tag for this release is available at:
> *http://s.apache.org/1.0.0rc1 <http://s.apache.org/1.0.0rc1>*
>
>
> Release artifacts are available for review at:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/climate/1.0.0_rc1/
>
>
> Please vote on releasing these packages as Apache OCW 1.0.0. The vote is
> open for at least the next 72 hours
>
>
> Only votes from Apache OCW PMC are binding, but folks are welcome to check
> the
> release candidate and voice their approval or disapproval. The vote passes
> if at least three binding +1 votes are cast.
>
> [ ] +1 Release the packages as Apache OCW 1.0.0
>
> [ ] -1 Do not release the packages because...
>
> P.S Kudos to whoever produced the release documentation.
> P.P.S Here's my +1
> Thanks
>
>
> --
> *Lewis*
>

Reply via email to