The terminology for plugins has unfortunate overloading when it comes to the term 'ServerResource'. As a Java class, it seems to be used to in the implementation both a plugin's ServerComponent and a plugin's ServerResource. E.g. the KVM plugin has a 'dummy' ServerResource in the management server, and a real ServerResource in the remote agent.
With that in mind, do you mean for the C# component to be accessible over a RESTful API from plugin classes loaded into the management server? DL > -----Original Message----- > From: Koushik Das [mailto:koushik....@citrix.com] > Sent: 26 March 2013 12:52 PM > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Cc: cloudstack-...@incubator.apache.org > Subject: RE: [DISCUSS] Hyper-V Plugin & Microsoft Compiler & IP Clearance > > Better to write the C# component doing Hyper-V specific stuff as a > standalone component and expose a REST API. The ServerResource class is > still in java and makes REST calls to the C# component. > > -Koushik > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Donal Lafferty [mailto:donal.laffe...@citrix.com] > > Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2013 3:29 PM > > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > > Cc: cloudstack-...@incubator.apache.org > > Subject: RE: [DISCUSS] Hyper-V Plugin & Microsoft Compiler & IP > > Clearance > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: rohityada...@gmail.com [mailto:rohityada...@gmail.com] On > > Behalf > > > Of Rohit Yadav > > > Sent: 26 March 2013 4:02 AM > > > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > > > Cc: cloudstack-...@incubator.apache.org > > > Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Hyper-V Plugin & Microsoft Compiler & IP > > > Clearance > > > > > > On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 4:31 AM, Donal Lafferty > > > <donal.laffe...@citrix.com> > > > wrote: > > > > It makes a lot of sense to write the ServerResourse for Hyper-V in > > > > C#, > > > because there's a lot of frameworks written in the Microsoft > > > ecosystem with C# in mind. > > > > > > > > If that's the case, then it also makes sense to use the Microsoft > > > > compiler to > > > compile the ServerResource. > > > > > > This won't get much love, instead of a compiler from the North > > > Atlantic giant, > > [Donal Lafferty] > > Northwest Pacific :) > > > if you were to use C# anyway why not consider using mono for your > > > compiler/build infrastructure? While I would avoid mono and it would > > > be difficult for folks to build/develop, if something could be done > > > in C#, could n't it be done in Java, Scala or anything that could > > > run on JVM? If this is possible, it will save us from nonoss, > > > proprietary > > build/runtime dependency. > > [Donal Lafferty] > > It's a question of what environment is optimal for the ServerResource. > > There is a lot more material for writing a server resource in C# than > > there is for writing it in Java. > > > > Moreover, the ServerResource concept of a plugin was introduced to > > allow developers a degree of freedom in choosing the environment for > > code that controls data centre resource. Adopting platform-specific > > tools seems to flow naturally from this definition. I guess you could > > call this the multi-lingual > > plugin: one where the ServerResource and ServerComponent are not > > homogenous. > > > > What are the barriers to including 'multi-lingual plugins' in CloudStack? > > > > > > > > Cheers. > > > > > > > > > > > I'm unclear how this impacts contributing the code to Apache > CloudStack. > > > In particular: > > > > > > > > > > > > 1. Does dependence on the Microsoft compiler mean that the > source > > > end up in the non-OSS build? > > > > > > > > 2. Is the plugin able to participate in the BVT? > > > > > > > >
