We can look into it, my guess is that an existing script now has new and/or
different parameters. Perhaps it could be adjusted to be backward
compatible so people can reboot at their leisure. All just guesswork.
On Mar 27, 2013 9:21 PM, "Marcus Sorensen" <shadow...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hard to say. Sometimes functionality/implementation changes even though
> the feature is the same.
> On Mar 27, 2013 9:20 PM, "David Nalley" <da...@gnsa.us> wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 11:13 PM, Marcus Sorensen <shadow...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> > Just to clarify a step further, this should have been the case with 3.x
>> to
>> > 4.0 as well. We had all of these new vpc scripts that added brand new
>> > functionality that needed to go on the virtual routers. The system VM
>> > template stayed the same, even though new scripts were added via
>> > systemvm.iso.
>>
>>
>> That said, why would new functionality make existing functionality
>> stop working in a system VM.
>>
>> --David
>>
>

Reply via email to