-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/10292/#review18696
-----------------------------------------------------------



client/tomcatconf/componentContext.xml.in
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/10292/#comment39129>

    Kelven, can you have a look at my commit on the same ticket. The Nicira and 
midonet gurus are missing here.
    
    Cheers,
    
    Hugo


- Hugo Trippaers


On April 4, 2013, 10:14 p.m., Kelven Yang wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/10292/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated April 4, 2013, 10:14 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for cloudstack and Chip Childers.
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> With removal of component auto-scanning, all components are needed to 
> configure in XML files. For OSS deployment, component declarations will be in 
> applicationContext.xml and componentContext.xml, for non-OSS deployment, 
> component declarations will be in applicationContext.xml and 
> nonossComponentContext.xml
> 
> OSS/non-OSS common components should all go to applicationContext.xml, OSS or 
> non-OSS specific components, or if there are OSS or non-OSS specific adapter 
> configurations, they should go to componentContext.xml or 
> nonComponentContext.xml respecitively.
> 
> If you add a big feature module, organize all components for the module into 
> its own section. 
> 
> 
> This addresses bug CLOUDSTACK-1917.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   client/tomcatconf/applicationContext.xml.in 17725f0 
>   client/tomcatconf/componentContext.xml.in 2a4a29f 
>   client/tomcatconf/nonossComponentContext.xml.in 13004c3 
>   utils/src/com/cloud/utils/component/AdapterList.java PRE-CREATION 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/10292/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> manual test is done for both OSS/non-OSS
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Kelven Yang
> 
>

Reply via email to