On Tue, Apr 09, 2013 at 05:12:58PM +0000, Pranav Saxena wrote: > If you think that the admin should not have the flexibility to delete a user > within the admin account from the UI ( one has to use the API's to do such > tasks then) , we can go ahead without this change for 4.1 and incorporate > this change for 4.2 . >
I'm actually trying to understand if this is a *feature change*, regardless of whether we want it to behave this way or not. Make sense? > Thanks, > Pranav > > -----Original Message----- > From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com] > Sent: Tuesday, April 09, 2013 10:34 PM > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Cc: Alena Prokharchyk > Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] - Deletion of Users within the Admin account > > On Tue, Apr 09, 2013 at 04:53:38PM +0000, Pranav Saxena wrote: > > Is the current state of 4.1 and master a change in behaviour from 4.0.0? > > [Pranav] - I didn't check 4.0 but the behavior in 4.1 and master seem to be > > exactly the same . > > > > If it isn't a change, I'd like to propose that we set the fix version > > to > > 4.2.0 at a minimum. Pending the outcome of this discussion thread, perhaps > > it will be closed with "won't fix", or perhaps it gets fixed. > > [Pranav] - Since the bug was marked as Critical for 4.1 , we can fix it in > > both . It is definitely an API bug which needs to be fixed as admin account > > should not be allowed to be deleted . Moreover from the UI perspective , I > > need a condition to distinguish between the two types of users to showcase > > delete options on the UI accordingly. > > > > > > If it *is* a change, can we implement a fix that restores past behaviour as > > a first step? > > [Pranav] - I believe , it should be a "demanding" change if at all 4.0 is > > also having a similar behavior ( which I am not sure of right now) since > > conceptually and technically we should not be following the current > > behavior in any version . > > As far as 4.1.0 goes, I'd like to release without this change... unless we > know that it behaved more appropriately in 4.0.0. > > Thoughts? >
