On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 11:59:59AM -0600, Marcus Sorensen wrote: > I'm testing the fix for that now. > > Also, this fix revealed an upstream bug in the management server. There is > a path in advanceStart that can allow it to complete and return a null > object without having successfully started the VM. The caller of this > method (the orch service) doesn't care about the output, it relies on this > method throwing an exception if the VM fails to start. The result is that > calling startVirtualMachine can return a good result, but the VM never > started. > > In short I'll be filing a second bug soon. I'm testing a fix for this one > as well.
Are both fixes in the patch you just submitted (which I'm checking and pushing now)?