Thanks Simon! Much appreciated. On Sun, Apr 21, 2013, at 09:44 AM, Simon Weller wrote: > > > Build process completed with NONOSS patches. > Rolled RPMS for 6.3. > Installed and tested basic functionality successfully. > > +1 > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Joe Brockmeier" <j...@zonker.net> > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Sent: Saturday, April 20, 2013 10:50:11 AM > Subject: [VOTE][ACS402] Apache CloudStack 4.0.2 (Third Round) > > Hi all, > > I've created a 4.0.2 release, and am asking for you to test the > artifacts and *after* testing, please submit a vote. > > Suggested testing procedure here: > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/CloudStack+4.0+test+procedure > > > (Please don't just +1 a release without any testing!) > > The following artifacts up for a vote: > > Git Branch and Commit SH: > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/4.0 > > Commit: 48e7eadb85bd033b642cbc83b0698d4175a183fb > > List of changes: > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=blob_plain;f=CHANGES;hb=4.0 > > > Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same > location): > http://people.apache.org/~jzb/cloudstack/dist/releases/4.0.2/ > > PGP release keys (signed using A0207CD4): > http://www.apache.org/dist/incubator/cloudstack/KEYS > > Vote will be open for 72 hours. > > NOTE: The only changes between this and the last voting round are to the > version numbers in the three pom.xml files that aren't automatically > changed to 4.0.2. The nonoss build breaks if the versions aren't > correct, so that is fixed now. > > If you are trying to build nonoss RPMs, the default cloud.spec won't > work. So if you want to build nonoss RPMs for 4.0.2, grab this spec file > and cp it to cloud.spec under your cloudstack source directory: > > http://people.apache.org/~jzb/cloudstack/dist/releases/4.0.2/nonoss.cloud.spec > > > For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to > indicate "(binding)" with their vote? > > [ ] +1 approve > [ ] +0 no opinion > [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why) > > Best, > > jzb > -- > Joe Brockmeier > j...@zonker.net > Twitter: @jzb > http://www.dissociatedpress.net/ > > > > > > >
Best, jzb -- Joe Brockmeier j...@zonker.net Twitter: @jzb http://www.dissociatedpress.net/
