On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 01:33:32PM -0700, Alena Prokharchyk wrote: > On 4/22/13 12:29 PM, "Chip Childers" <chip.child...@sungard.com> wrote: > > >On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 07:25:53PM +0000, Pranav Saxena wrote: > >> If we don't , then the only trade-off is the deletion of the users > >>accounts won't be possible :) . IMHO , we should be allowing that . > >> > >> I'll leave it upto you to take a final go at it . > > > >Tell you what... why don't you go ahead and back port it. If it > >happens to get into 4.1.0, then great. Otherwise it'll be in 4.1.1. > > > > Chip, the fix includes the DB upgrade - adding the "default" field to > user/account DB tables. I've already made changes to 4.1-4.2 upgrade path > on master. If we backport the fix to 4.1 branch, where the db upgrade > steps should go? As we don't know yet whether it becomes 4.1.1 or 4.1.0 > yet. > > -Alena. > >
Hmmm... well we have been trying to *not* do schema changes for bug-fix releases. If things worked this way for 4.0.x, I don't see any reason to jump on pushing this into 4.1.x ATM. Perhaps we just leave it in master then. Others?
