Yes...I believe I will have it working for XenServer by that time with VMware and KVM to follow shortly thereafter.
It depends a bit on how many storage-framework issues I come across. For example, last night I ran into code that assumed zone-wide storage was only for KVM (at one time in development this was probably true). I've also got a question pending to Edison about the grantAccess and revokeAccess methods...if they will be utilized by the framework for 4.2. Based on the answer, it will likely influence my work. On Thu, May 9, 2013 at 11:30 AM, Animesh Chaturvedi < animesh.chaturv...@citrix.com> wrote: > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Mike Tutkowski [mailto:mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com] > > Sent: Wednesday, May 08, 2013 10:55 PM > > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > > Subject: Re: [ACS42] Schedule Remember - Feature freeze on 2013-05-31 > > > > Hi Animesh, > > > > I have a quick question for you. > > > > As you know, I'm in the process of developing a storage plug-in for 4.2. > > > > I'm working with Edison on getting some issues out of the storage > framework > > as well as completing the implementation of the plug-in. > > > > Can you tell me how I should handle our situation in that we will likely > be > > close, but not quite there yet, as of May 31st? > > > > Can we check in what we have (as long as we don't break functionality > that > > we're aware of) and then deal with remaining issues after? > > > > Not sure exactly how the process works here. > > > > Thanks! > > > > > [Animesh>] Mike as community we agreed to be on time based release and as > such it means feature should be complete with test and need to be in > master by 5/31 to be included for 4.2. Would you have a logical chunk of > working feature available by 5/31? > > -- *Mike Tutkowski* *Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.* e: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com o: 303.746.7302 Advancing the way the world uses the cloud<http://solidfire.com/solution/overview/?video=play> *™*
