Murali, I've updated the document to give more background details on the thought process. I'm sorry that I'm having hard time to describe it like other normal high-level FS, since the change is at architecture level, and to understand why we are doing this makes sense from conceptual level. The document is more organized as a thought process.
Kelven On 5/6/13 5:11 AM, "Murali Reddy" <murali.re...@citrix.com> wrote: > >Great to see long-standing problem being addressed. I get how revamped >job's framework that can handle both internal and external jobs with >ability to serialize the operations on a VM will help in VmSync. But I >could not understand how a message bus that helps in coordinate activities >with in management server, will be used to solve the vmsync issues. Can >you please elobrate how you intend to use message bus. > >On 04/05/13 8:06 AM, "Kelven Yang" <kelven.y...@citrix.com> wrote: > >>I would like to propose an improvement effort on VMSync. This is to help >>build better interaction with external virtualization manager (i.e., >>vCenter) for features like native HA, DRS and FT. >> >>https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/FS+-+VMSync+improv >>e >>ment >> >>Since it is a low-level change and hard to describe it in short, only >>high-level principals are detailed in FS. >> >>Please review the first draft of FS and provide your comments and >>feedback. >> >>Kelven >> > >
