On 20/05/13 11:31 PM, "Chip Childers" <chip.child...@sungard.com> wrote:
>On Mon, May 20, 2013 at 02:19:24PM +0000, Murali Reddy wrote: >> >> Swamy, >> >> As mentioned in my merge request [1], I have generalised this feature >>and >> tried to not enforce AWS EIP semantics. Please see the updated FS [2] >> >> [1] http://s.apache.org/xjy >> [2] >> >>https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/portable+public+IP >> >> Let me know if you need further clarification. > >Do you want the older page to be deleted? Is it still relevant? >Perhaps we should move it to an abandoned designs parent page? Its not relevant, left a note in the old FS mentioning it as obsolete. Also moved the spec out of 4.2 design documents to 'designs not committed for any release' for now. > >> >> Thanks, >> Murali >> >> On 15/05/13 10:51 PM, "Venkata SwamyBabu Budumuru" >> <venkataswamybabu.budum...@citrix.com> wrote: >> >> >Hi, >> > >> >I didn't find the old mail thread about this FS. Hence posting my >>review >> >comments in a new thread. >> > >> >I have few queries/ comments after reviewing the FS [1] >> > >> >[1] https://cwiki.apache.org/CLOUDSTACK/eip-enhancements.html >> >[2] Prior discussion thread : http://sy.pe/6bNG >> > >> > >> >1. Are we providing any flexibility for admin to impose no. of EIPs an >> >account can use? >> >2. As per the Spec, when an instance has a public ip with >> >is_system=false, then we don't let user asosciateEIP. I feel, it would >>be >> >better if allow the user to associate EIP in this case? >> >3. When "Associate PublicIP" is false then are going to keep all the >> >semantics to stand the same except the fact that vm deployment by >>default >> >not getting the public ip? >> >4. Do allow CS to reprogram NAT rules on the provider in case of n/w >> >restarts? >> >5. Under Scope, point 4 says that we only support static NAT on region >> >level EIP. Is this true for advanced zones as well? we cannot we >>support >> >other services like PF / LB etc..,? >> >6. Can you confirm that we are supporting this for Shared n/ws in >> >advanced zone? >> >7. I see in the spec that "createElasticIpRange" API not having any >>VLAN >> >id. Are we supporting region level IP CIDR with both tagged and >>untagged? >> >multiple subnets in the same VLAN and different VLANs etc.., >> >8. When there is an ElasticIp associated with instance, Does the >>current >> >implementation release this IP and gives it back to account when VM got >> >to stopped state? if yes, does this mean user has to associateEIP every >> >time user starts instance? >> > >> > >> >Thanks, >> >SWAMY >> > >> > >> >> >> >
