On Tue, May 21, 2013, at 09:08 AM, Chip Childers wrote: > There wasn't a plan to do a 4.0.3, but I guess you could run with it if > you wanted to push that out there. Alternatively, help getting 4.1.0 > out the door (with this fix) could be another path to helping that user.
I'm planning to be offline today, but I'll ask if folks think we need a 4.0.3. At this point, I think that a VOTE on a 4.0.3 with this (and another issue that was directed my way last week while I was traveling) would be a distraction. But let's see what folks think. Best, jzb -- Joe Brockmeier j...@zonker.net Twitter: @jzb http://www.dissociatedpress.net/
