-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/11989/#review22322
-----------------------------------------------------------


Commit f7b1d3d8d5be58a8032fc79eec4dd5711226b93a in branch refs/heads/master 
from Harikrishna Patnala
[ https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;h=f7b1d3d ]

CLOUDSTACK-2916: admin is not able to login through UI after setting GP 
"cluster.cpu.allocated.capacity.notificationthreshold" to some string
CLOUDSTACK-2457:  No check for input values,special character,-ive values can 
be assigne to GLobal parameter "cluster.cpu.allocated.capacity.disablethreshold"

Added validation for float values and checking limit for weight based 
parameters by creating a set of parameters.
Signed off by : nitin mehta<nitin.me...@citrix.com>


- ASF Subversion and Git Services


On June 20, 2013, 9:42 a.m., Harikrishna Patnala wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/11989/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated June 20, 2013, 9:42 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for cloudstack, Abhinandan Prateek and Nitin Mehta.
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> CLOUDSTACK-2916: admin is not able to login through UI after setting GP 
> "cluster.cpu.allocated.capacity.notificationthreshold" to some string 
> CLOUDSTACK-2457:  No check for input values,special character,-ive values can 
> be assigne to GLobal parameter 
> "cluster.cpu.allocated.capacity.disablethreshold"
> 
> Added validation for float values and checking limit for weight based 
> parameters by creating a set of parameters.
> 
> 
> This addresses bugs CLOUDSTACK-2457 and CLOUDSTACK-2916.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   server/src/com/cloud/configuration/ConfigurationManagerImpl.java 131d340 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/11989/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> Tested locally
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Harikrishna Patnala
> 
>

Reply via email to