Chip,

I apologize for my lack clarity.  I am only -1 for master merge until the 
community has reviewed the changes and come to consensus on landing the change. 
 I am +1 to push the changes into a dedicated feature branch within the ASF 
repo.. 

Thanks,
-John

On Jul 15, 2013, at 4:34 PM, Chip Childers <chip.child...@sungard.com> wrote:

> On Mon, Jul 15, 2013 at 04:30:53PM -0400, John Burwell wrote:
>> Dharnesh,
>> 
>> I am placing a pre-emptive -1 on this patch merge because I don't feel 
>> adequate community awareness/coordination regarding the impact of this 
>> change.  In particular, I want to make the sure the timing is appropriate 
>> since we doing a lot of master->4.2 merges at the moment.  This patch will 
>> increase the difficulty of these merges.  Please email send a [MERGE] email 
>> (e.g. subject "[MERGE] Global Conversion from com.cloud.* to org.apache.*") 
>> to the list explaining the scope of the change in detail and the potential 
>> impacts.  Once the community arrives at a consensus on timing and impacts, I 
>> will withdraw my -1.
>> 
> 
> AFAIK, the idea was to get them into the repo, under the
> namespacechanges branch.  After they are in, that's a good place to go
> through the conflict resolution, etc...  and then do the process you are
> suggesting.
> 
>> Thanks,
>> -John
>> 
>> On Jul 15, 2013, at 4:20 PM, Dharmesh Kakadia <dhkaka...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> 
>>> Hi,
>>> 
>>> I have completed the namespace changes to org.apache. A single patch was 
>>> leaving some deleted files behind. I tried to figure out the problem for a 
>>> day, but didn't get any issue. So I have created 3 different patches and 
>>> uploaded to the reviewboard (https://reviews.apache.org/r/12198/).
>>> 
>>> I have updated the scripts as well as docs(mostly). I have build it with 
>>> all testcases and successfully ran management server. 
>>> 
>>> I will submit whitespace changes patch soon. In mean time if others can 
>>> test other scripts, packaging, specific extension etc. Is that required or 
>>> full test run is good enough ? we can merge changes on 20th accordingly.
>>> 
>>> Thanks,
>>> Dharmesh
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>> 

Reply via email to