My mistake. I'll have to update my style rules. DL
> -----Original Message----- > From: Alex Huang [mailto:alex.hu...@citrix.com] > Sent: 16 July 2013 2:54 PM > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: RE: [discuss] 80 char max length leads to illegiable source > > Donal, > > Our coding convention says 180. It was discussed about a week or two back. > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Coding+conventi > ons > > --Alex > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Donal Lafferty [mailto:donal.laffe...@citrix.com] > > Sent: Tuesday, July 16, 2013 6:02 AM > > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > > Subject: [discuss] 80 char max length leads to illegiable source > > > > This issue appeared when I used StyleCheck and Eclipse to find and fix > > my coding convention violations automatically. Details at > > http://dlafferty.blogspot.co.uk/2013/07/apache-cloudstack-java-coding. > > html > > > > We inherit the 80 char line limit inherited from the Java Programming > > Style, and it makes my tests unreadable. JSON serialised objects in > > long strings are confusing. Readability problems also arise in non-test > > Java > source. > > Can we loosen/ignore this rule when readability becomes an issue? > > > > > > DL
