Hey Rohit, The argument applies, indeed, but it's too late for those... Isn't it?
On 5 December 2023 14:23:53 GMT, Rohit Yadav <rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com> wrote: >Lucian, all, > >Your argument pretty would also apply to also our current use of Github issues >and pull requests (and milestones, CI/github actions etc), which have become >are daily drivers. > >I had another round of checks - from an ASF/mailing lists point of view, in >case Github goes the wrong path, all such discussions will still be available >on users@ ML (archive) and possibly a migration path would be determined by >the ASF infra (such as to Gitlab etc). > > >Regards. > >________________________________ >From: Nux <n...@li.nux.ro> >Sent: Tuesday, November 28, 2023 15:40 >To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org <dev@cloudstack.apache.org> >Cc: Rohit Yadav <rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com> >Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Adopting Github Discusssions Users Forum > >Personally I'm against that, as it will dilute the community and once >the mailing lists will get inactive they'll stay that way. > >Also github/discussions is a proprietary platform at Microsoft's whim, I >think this goes against the spirit of the project as free software. > >That said, I'll be "voting" -0, don't want to get in the way of >"progress". > >On 2023-11-28 09:28, Rohit Yadav wrote: >> All, >> >> It's been a while since I had last proposed adopting and trying the >> Github Discussions feature for our users community. Since then, the ASF >> infra seems to have enabled integration and allowing Discussions >> integrated with mailing lists: >> https://github.com/search?q=.asf.yaml+discussions&type=code >> >> Following discussions with both technical and non-technical users from >> the CCC, I believe we should try this out and use it for users to >> discuss their ideas, questions, and problems, all that traditionally >> has happened on the users@ ML; while been integrating such discussions >> on the users@ ML. The Discussions platform could be used by developers >> too to get feedback from users. >> >> That said, we MUST continue to use our mailing lists for any project >> governance related matters such as releases related discussions, >> releases voting, and any form of consensus and decision making. >> >> I've proposed a PR for this here where the discussions feature is tied >> to users@ ML: >> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/8274/files >> >> Thoughts and feedback? >> >> >> Regards. > > >
