Hi, The files are currently in : http://bit.ly/18Ae7zH
Thanks, Amogh On 7/24/13 1:22 PM, "Chip Childers" <chip.child...@sungard.com> wrote: >I don't think you need to wait. I actually need the files in the repo >to pick up on them anyway for the docs. > > >On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 08:13:59PM +0000, Frank Zhang wrote: >> Thanks Chip. Let me know once you done so I can get Amogh's patch in >> >> > -----Original Message----- >> > From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com] >> > Sent: Wednesday, July 24, 2013 12:19 PM >> > To: <dev@cloudstack.apache.org> >> > Subject: Re: Inclusion of commons-httpclient-contrib jar >> > >> > We just need to include it in the legal docs. It's compatible, but >>all external >> > code and dependencies need to be accounted for. >> > >> > I see that this is from the ASF actually, so adding it is easy. I'll >>take a look at >> > doing it shortly. >> > >> > >> > On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 2:28 PM, Frank Zhang <frank.zh...@citrix.com> >> > wrote: >> > >> > > Amogh has checked it's Apache 2. I am not sure if any process we >>need >> > > to go through >> > > >> > > > -----Original Message----- >> > > > From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com] >> > > > Sent: Wednesday, July 24, 2013 11:24 AM >> > > > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org >> > > > Subject: Re: Inclusion of commons-httpclient-contrib jar >> > > > >> > > > Nobody has bothered to deal with the LICENSE file for the file >> > > > described >> > > below. >> > > > >> > > > Anyone want to take this on, or at least give me the information >> > > required? >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 05:59:59PM +0000, Frank Zhang wrote: >> > > > > Agree. Amogh actually has done it in cloud-utils >> > > > > >> > > > > > -----Original Message----- >> > > > > > From: Koushik Das [mailto:koushik....@citrix.com] >> > > > > > Sent: Wednesday, July 24, 2013 10:26 AM >> > > > > > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org >> > > > > > Subject: RE: Inclusion of commons-httpclient-contrib jar >> > > > > > >> > > > > > For now I think cloud-utils is the best option. >> > > > > > >> > > > > > > -----Original Message----- >> > > > > > > From: Amogh Vasekar [mailto:amogh.vase...@citrix.com] >> > > > > > > Sent: Wednesday, July 24, 2013 10:48 PM >> > > > > > > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org >> > > > > > > Subject: Re: Inclusion of commons-httpclient-contrib jar >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > Hi Alex, >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > Thanks! I had looked at that initially, but found this >> > > > > > > disclaimer on the source website : >> > > > > > > "Warning: >> > > > > > > not-yet-commons-ssl-0.3.11 should be considered to be of >>"Alpha" >> > > > quality!" >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > I do not see a code update in it for the past 4 years, and >> > > > > > > thus >> > > was skeptical. >> > > > > > > Please let me know if we should go ahead with it. >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > Thanks, >> > > > > > > Amogh >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > On 7/23/13 10:51 PM, "Alex Huang" <alex.hu...@citrix.com> >>wrote: >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >Amogh, >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >I added the following to the pom.xml for cisco and it seems >> > > > > > > >to compile with a few extra exceptions try-catch added. >>Can >> > > > > > > >you check on if you can use this? >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > ><dependency> >> > > > > > > > <groupId>ca.juliusdavies</groupId> >> > > > > > > > <artifactId>not-yet-commons-ssl</artifactId> >> > > > > > > > <version>0.3.11</version> </dependency> >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >--Alx >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> -----Original Message----- >> > > > > > > >> From: Alex Huang [mailto:alex.hu...@citrix.com] >> > > > > > > >> Sent: Tuesday, July 23, 2013 10:25 PM >> > > > > > > >> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org >> > > > > > > >> Subject: RE: Inclusion of commons-httpclient-contrib jar >> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > >> Isn't this in commons-httpclient 3.1? >> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > >> http://grepcode.com/file/repo1.maven.org/maven2/commons- >> > > > > > > >> httpclient/commons- >> > > > > > > >> >>httpclient/3.1/org/apache/commons/httpclient/contrib/ssl/Ea >> > > > > > > >> syX5 >> > > > > > > >> 09Tr >> > > > > > > >> us >> > > > > > > >> tM >> > > > > > > >> anager.java >> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > >> --Alex >> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > >> > -----Original Message----- >> > > > > > > >> > From: Chiradeep Vittal >> > > > > > > >> > [mailto:chiradeep.vit...@citrix.com] >> > > > > > > >> > Sent: Tuesday, July 23, 2013 9:41 PM >> > > > > > > >> > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org >> > > > > > > >> > Subject: Re: Inclusion of commons-httpclient-contrib >>jar >> > > > > > > >> > >> > > > > > > >> > +1 >> > > > > > > >> > @Frank, it is not a re-implementation, but a copy. >> > > > > > > >> > >> > > > > > > >> > On 7/24/13 2:14 AM, "Amogh Vasekar" >> > > > > > > >> > <amogh.vase...@citrix.com> >> > > > > > > >> wrote: >> > > > > > > >> > >> > > > > > > >> > >In the absence of an officially published jar on maven >> > > > > > > >> > >for contrib-ssl, the current idea is to put this >>package >> > > > > > > >> > >in cloud-utils (it is a dependency for both cisco-vnmc >> > > > > > > >> > >and ucs) for easier >> > > > > > > >>maintenance. >> > > > > > > >> > >Please let me know if this sounds good. >> > > > > > > >> > > >> > > > > > > >> > >Thanks, >> > > > > > > >> > >Amogh >> > > > > > > >> > > >> > > > > > > >> > >On 7/22/13 5:26 PM, "Frank Zhang" >> > > > > > > >> > ><frank.zh...@citrix.com> >> > > > wrote: >> > > > > > > >> > > >> > > > > > > >> > >>I prefer to just use httpclient-contribs.jar as it >>has >> > > > > > > >> > >>been proven by lots of users. >> > > > > > > >> > >>Reimplementing such code brings no gain but >>maintenance >> > > effort. >> > > > > > > >> > >> >> > > > > > > >> > >>> -----Original Message----- >> > > > > > > >> > >>> From: Amogh Vasekar >>[mailto:amogh.vase...@citrix.com] >> > > > > > > >> > >>> Sent: Monday, July 22, 2013 5:17 PM >> > > > > > > >> > >>> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org >> > > > > > > >> > >>> Subject: Inclusion of commons-httpclient-contrib >>jar >> > > > > > > >> > >>> >> > > > > > > >> > >>> Hi All, >> > > > > > > >> > >>> >> > > > > > > >> > >>> I was working on a HTTPS related fix, and found >>this >> > > > > > > >> > >>>package in the codebase : >> > > > > > > >> > >>> >> > > > > > > >> > >>> >> > > > > > > >>https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/tree/master/plugins/netwo >> > > > > > > r >> > > > > > > >> > >>> k- >> > > > > > > >> > >>> elements/c >> > > > > > > >> > >>> >>isco-vnmc/src/org/apache/commons/httpclient/contrib/s >> > > > > > > >> > >>> sl >> > > > > > > >> > >>> >> > > > > > > >> > >>> I need to use the same classes, which are already a >> > > > > > > >> > >>>part of httpclient-contribs jar >> > > > > > > >> > >>> >> > > > > > > >> > >> > > > > > > >>>>>(http://www.java2s.com/Code/Jar/c/Downloadcommonshttpclient >> > > > > > > >>>con >> > > > > > > >> tr >> > > > > > > >> > ib31jar. >> > > > > > > >> > >>> htm >> > > > > > > >> > >>> ) >> > > > > > > >> > >>> >> > > > > > > >> > >>> Was wondering if there is a specific reason the jar >> > > > > > > >> > >>>was not included instead (probably since it is a >> > > > > > > >> > >>>contrib >> > > > > > > >> > >>>jar?) >> > > > > > > >> > >>> >> > > > > > > >> > >>> Thanks, >> > > > > > > >> > >>> Amogh >> > > > > > > >> > >> >> > > > > > > >> > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > >> > > >>