Right, that's what I thought. Frank, what were you saying you were waiting for?
On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 08:38:36PM +0000, Amogh Vasekar wrote: > Hi, > > The files are currently in : http://bit.ly/18Ae7zH > > Thanks, > Amogh > > On 7/24/13 1:22 PM, "Chip Childers" <chip.child...@sungard.com> wrote: > > >I don't think you need to wait. I actually need the files in the repo > >to pick up on them anyway for the docs. > > > > > >On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 08:13:59PM +0000, Frank Zhang wrote: > >> Thanks Chip. Let me know once you done so I can get Amogh's patch in > >> > >> > -----Original Message----- > >> > From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com] > >> > Sent: Wednesday, July 24, 2013 12:19 PM > >> > To: <dev@cloudstack.apache.org> > >> > Subject: Re: Inclusion of commons-httpclient-contrib jar > >> > > >> > We just need to include it in the legal docs. It's compatible, but > >>all external > >> > code and dependencies need to be accounted for. > >> > > >> > I see that this is from the ASF actually, so adding it is easy. I'll > >>take a look at > >> > doing it shortly. > >> > > >> > > >> > On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 2:28 PM, Frank Zhang <frank.zh...@citrix.com> > >> > wrote: > >> > > >> > > Amogh has checked it's Apache 2. I am not sure if any process we > >>need > >> > > to go through > >> > > > >> > > > -----Original Message----- > >> > > > From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com] > >> > > > Sent: Wednesday, July 24, 2013 11:24 AM > >> > > > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > >> > > > Subject: Re: Inclusion of commons-httpclient-contrib jar > >> > > > > >> > > > Nobody has bothered to deal with the LICENSE file for the file > >> > > > described > >> > > below. > >> > > > > >> > > > Anyone want to take this on, or at least give me the information > >> > > required? > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 05:59:59PM +0000, Frank Zhang wrote: > >> > > > > Agree. Amogh actually has done it in cloud-utils > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > -----Original Message----- > >> > > > > > From: Koushik Das [mailto:koushik....@citrix.com] > >> > > > > > Sent: Wednesday, July 24, 2013 10:26 AM > >> > > > > > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > >> > > > > > Subject: RE: Inclusion of commons-httpclient-contrib jar > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > For now I think cloud-utils is the best option. > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > >> > > > > > > From: Amogh Vasekar [mailto:amogh.vase...@citrix.com] > >> > > > > > > Sent: Wednesday, July 24, 2013 10:48 PM > >> > > > > > > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > >> > > > > > > Subject: Re: Inclusion of commons-httpclient-contrib jar > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > Hi Alex, > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > Thanks! I had looked at that initially, but found this > >> > > > > > > disclaimer on the source website : > >> > > > > > > "Warning: > >> > > > > > > not-yet-commons-ssl-0.3.11 should be considered to be of > >>"Alpha" > >> > > > quality!" > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > I do not see a code update in it for the past 4 years, and > >> > > > > > > thus > >> > > was skeptical. > >> > > > > > > Please let me know if we should go ahead with it. > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > Thanks, > >> > > > > > > Amogh > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > On 7/23/13 10:51 PM, "Alex Huang" <alex.hu...@citrix.com> > >>wrote: > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >Amogh, > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >I added the following to the pom.xml for cisco and it seems > >> > > > > > > >to compile with a few extra exceptions try-catch added. > >>Can > >> > > > > > > >you check on if you can use this? > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > ><dependency> > >> > > > > > > > <groupId>ca.juliusdavies</groupId> > >> > > > > > > > <artifactId>not-yet-commons-ssl</artifactId> > >> > > > > > > > <version>0.3.11</version> </dependency> > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >--Alx > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> -----Original Message----- > >> > > > > > > >> From: Alex Huang [mailto:alex.hu...@citrix.com] > >> > > > > > > >> Sent: Tuesday, July 23, 2013 10:25 PM > >> > > > > > > >> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > >> > > > > > > >> Subject: RE: Inclusion of commons-httpclient-contrib jar > >> > > > > > > >> > >> > > > > > > >> Isn't this in commons-httpclient 3.1? > >> > > > > > > >> > >> > > > > > > >> http://grepcode.com/file/repo1.maven.org/maven2/commons- > >> > > > > > > >> httpclient/commons- > >> > > > > > > >> > >>httpclient/3.1/org/apache/commons/httpclient/contrib/ssl/Ea > >> > > > > > > >> syX5 > >> > > > > > > >> 09Tr > >> > > > > > > >> us > >> > > > > > > >> tM > >> > > > > > > >> anager.java > >> > > > > > > >> > >> > > > > > > >> --Alex > >> > > > > > > >> > >> > > > > > > >> > -----Original Message----- > >> > > > > > > >> > From: Chiradeep Vittal > >> > > > > > > >> > [mailto:chiradeep.vit...@citrix.com] > >> > > > > > > >> > Sent: Tuesday, July 23, 2013 9:41 PM > >> > > > > > > >> > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > >> > > > > > > >> > Subject: Re: Inclusion of commons-httpclient-contrib > >>jar > >> > > > > > > >> > > >> > > > > > > >> > +1 > >> > > > > > > >> > @Frank, it is not a re-implementation, but a copy. > >> > > > > > > >> > > >> > > > > > > >> > On 7/24/13 2:14 AM, "Amogh Vasekar" > >> > > > > > > >> > <amogh.vase...@citrix.com> > >> > > > > > > >> wrote: > >> > > > > > > >> > > >> > > > > > > >> > >In the absence of an officially published jar on maven > >> > > > > > > >> > >for contrib-ssl, the current idea is to put this > >>package > >> > > > > > > >> > >in cloud-utils (it is a dependency for both cisco-vnmc > >> > > > > > > >> > >and ucs) for easier > >> > > > > > > >>maintenance. > >> > > > > > > >> > >Please let me know if this sounds good. > >> > > > > > > >> > > > >> > > > > > > >> > >Thanks, > >> > > > > > > >> > >Amogh > >> > > > > > > >> > > > >> > > > > > > >> > >On 7/22/13 5:26 PM, "Frank Zhang" > >> > > > > > > >> > ><frank.zh...@citrix.com> > >> > > > wrote: > >> > > > > > > >> > > > >> > > > > > > >> > >>I prefer to just use httpclient-contribs.jar as it > >>has > >> > > > > > > >> > >>been proven by lots of users. > >> > > > > > > >> > >>Reimplementing such code brings no gain but > >>maintenance > >> > > effort. > >> > > > > > > >> > >> > >> > > > > > > >> > >>> -----Original Message----- > >> > > > > > > >> > >>> From: Amogh Vasekar > >>[mailto:amogh.vase...@citrix.com] > >> > > > > > > >> > >>> Sent: Monday, July 22, 2013 5:17 PM > >> > > > > > > >> > >>> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > >> > > > > > > >> > >>> Subject: Inclusion of commons-httpclient-contrib > >>jar > >> > > > > > > >> > >>> > >> > > > > > > >> > >>> Hi All, > >> > > > > > > >> > >>> > >> > > > > > > >> > >>> I was working on a HTTPS related fix, and found > >>this > >> > > > > > > >> > >>>package in the codebase : > >> > > > > > > >> > >>> > >> > > > > > > >> > >>> > >> > > > > > > > >>https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/tree/master/plugins/netwo > >> > > > > > > r > >> > > > > > > >> > >>> k- > >> > > > > > > >> > >>> elements/c > >> > > > > > > >> > >>> > >>isco-vnmc/src/org/apache/commons/httpclient/contrib/s > >> > > > > > > >> > >>> sl > >> > > > > > > >> > >>> > >> > > > > > > >> > >>> I need to use the same classes, which are already a > >> > > > > > > >> > >>>part of httpclient-contribs jar > >> > > > > > > >> > >>> > >> > > > > > > >> > > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>(http://www.java2s.com/Code/Jar/c/Downloadcommonshttpclient > >> > > > > > > >>>con > >> > > > > > > >> tr > >> > > > > > > >> > ib31jar. > >> > > > > > > >> > >>> htm > >> > > > > > > >> > >>> ) > >> > > > > > > >> > >>> > >> > > > > > > >> > >>> Was wondering if there is a specific reason the jar > >> > > > > > > >> > >>>was not included instead (probably since it is a > >> > > > > > > >> > >>>contrib > >> > > > > > > >> > >>>jar?) > >> > > > > > > >> > >>> > >> > > > > > > >> > >>> Thanks, > >> > > > > > > >> > >>> Amogh > >> > > > > > > >> > >> > >> > > > > > > >> > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > >
