On Mon, Sep 09, 2013 at 10:42:48AM -0400, Simon Weller wrote: > -1 from me as well. > > > I know we're trying to hit timed releases, but I think it's very important to > preserve key underlying functionality across releases. If a supported and > documented feature is known to be broken, we need to address it...if we > don't, it's going to cause lots of pain, and reflect badly on ACS as a > project. >
Agreed. The idea of "time-based" is all about feature development. Quality shouldn't be sacrificed.
