I'm not sure I understand... my impression from your message is the stock 4.2 image works. This is for Xen, right? Does this mean that there's a step missing in building a custom system vm to make it match the stock image?
On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 9:30 AM, Daan Hoogland <daan.hoogl...@gmail.com> wrote: > H, > > The problem is when creating a newer image for the system template as > we did on our installations. It will not work with the 4.2 scripts. I > am not making hard my thread of this being a blocker but it is a > serious impediment for people wanting to harden their cloudstack > environment. > > I am voting a +0 here as I think we are not going to use this distro > for this reason. > > regards, > Daan > > On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 4:05 PM, Daan Hoogland <daan.hoogl...@gmail.com> > wrote: >> At Schuberg Philis, we did some tests and noted that the xe-deamon on >> router vms is not started and that xenstore no longer exist under that >> name. >> The xenstore binary is copied to xenstore-write, --ls etc so this >> could be solved. >> >> I am sure how to formulate this as to convince you all this is a >> blocker but am inclined to do so. >> >> more accurate report will follow, >> Daan >> >> On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 12:40 PM, Ian Duffy <i...@ianduffy.ie> wrote: >>> +1 >>> >>> Ran against simulator. >>> >>> >>> On 16 September 2013 11:25, Prasanna Santhanam <t...@apache.org> wrote: >>> >>>> +1 (binding) >>>> >>>> The test infra has deployed advanced zone with kvm and xenserver 6.2 >>>> since Saturday and I dont see any new failures [1]. So no regressions. >>>> Also ran the simulator against 4.2 [2] >>>> >>>> [1] >>>> http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/view/cloudstack-qa/job/test-regression-matrix/ >>>> [2] http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/view/simulator/job/run-checkin-tests/ >>>> >>>> On Sun, Sep 15, 2013 at 10:18:48PM -0400, Chip Childers wrote: >>>> > +1 (binding) >>>> > >>>> > Tested with simulator. >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > On Sep 14, 2013, at 5:59 PM, Marcus Sorensen <shadow...@gmail.com> >>>> wrote: >>>> > >>>> > > +1 (binding) >>>> > > >>>> > > Tested CentOS 6.4 and Ubuntu 12.04.3: >>>> > > create advanced zone >>>> > > create VPC >>>> > > register template >>>> > > create VPC tier >>>> > > create VM on tier w/NFS >>>> > > create VM on tier w/CLM >>>> > > create VM on tier w/Local storage >>>> > > create static NAT to vm, ssh in >>>> > > >>>> > > On Sat, Sep 14, 2013 at 10:28 AM, Rajesh Battala >>>> > > <rajesh.batt...@citrix.com> wrote: >>>> > >> +1 >>>> > >> >>>> > >> Tested VM Life cycle in Xenserver and KVM with Advance Zone >>>> configuration. >>>> > >> >>>> > >> Thanks >>>> > >> Rajesh Battala >>>> > >> >>>> > >> -----Original Message----- >>>> > >> From: Animesh Chaturvedi [mailto:animesh.chaturv...@citrix.com] >>>> > >> Sent: Saturday, September 14, 2013 4:43 AM >>>> > >> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org >>>> > >> Subject: Apache CloudStack 4.2.0 (fifth round) >>>> > >> >>>> > >> >>>> > >> I've created a 4.2.0 release, with the following artifacts up for a >>>> vote: >>>> > >> >>>> > >> Git Branch and Commit SH: >>>> > >> >>>> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/4.2 >>>> > >> Commit: c1e24ff89f6d14d6ae74d12dbca108c35449030f >>>> > >> >>>> > >> List of changes: >>>> > >> >>>> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=blob_plain;f=CHANGES;hb=4.2 >>>> > >> >>>> > >> Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same >>>> > >> location): >>>> > >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.2.0/ >>>> > >> >>>> > >> PGP release keys (signed using 94BE0D7C): >>>> > >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS >>>> > >> >>>> > >> Testing instructions are here: >>>> > >> >>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Release+test+procedure >>>> > >> >>>> > >> Vote will be open for 72 hours (Wednesday 9/18 End of Day PST). >>>> > >> >>>> > >> For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to >>>> indicate "(binding)" with their vote? >>>> > >> >>>> > >> [ ] +1 approve >>>> > >> [ ] +0 no opinion >>>> > >> [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why) >>>> > > >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Prasanna., >>>> >>>> ------------------------ >>>> Powered by BigRock.com >>>> >>>>
