I discarded the patch.  The purpose of throwing it up on review board was so 
that people could comment on the impact.  And the impact is bad.  

Darren

> On Sep 28, 2013, at 4:43 AM, "daan Hoogland" <daan.hoogl...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> 
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: 
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/14360/
> 
> On September 27th, 2013, 8:21 p.m. UTC, Alena Prokharchyk wrote:
> 
> Darren, changes in Network.java are going to break API compatibility as 
> capabilities parameters are used in createNetworkOffering API call 
> (serviceCapabilitystList param). CS UI and third party UI will get impacted 
> as well.
> If we have to change the name, its gotta be the capability parameter name, 
> not its name value.
> This in turn, could have impact on other uses, like in a db could it?
> 
> @Darren: you will need a lot more then just a (unit)test for the getname()
> 
> - daan
> 
> 
> On September 27th, 2013, 5:43 p.m. UTC, Darren Shepherd wrote:
> 
> Review request for cloudstack, Alena Prokharchyk and Chiradeep Vittal.
> By Darren Shepherd.
> Updated Sept. 27, 2013, 5:43 p.m.
> 
> Repository: cloudstack-git
> Description
> 
> VPCVirtualRouter is still left as inconsitent as changing that name will be 
> impactful.  The unit test checked in will still ensure that future providers 
> match though
> Diffs
> 
> api/src/com/cloud/network/Network.java (49f380b)
> api/test/com/cloud/network/NetworkTest.java (PRE-CREATION)
> View Diff

Reply via email to