this is not a counter proposal to your initiative, Jayapal. It sounds great. I just want to give cloud operators and domain admins more control on how to react on mishaps on the systemvms.
On Fri, Oct 4, 2013 at 11:17 AM, Daan Hoogland <daan.hoogl...@gmail.com>wrote: > Could we not use the native syslog to gather the info (process monitoring > will still be needed) and present an admin interface on this on the ms? > > > On Fri, Oct 4, 2013 at 10:59 AM, Jayapal Reddy Uradi < > jayapalreddy.ur...@citrix.com> wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> I am planning to write script utility to monitor processes and restart on >> the event of failure. It will also logs the events. >> >> Thanks, >> Jayapal >> >> On 02-Oct-2013, at 3:25 AM, Simon Weller <swel...@ena.com> wrote: >> >> > supervisord maybe? >> > >> > ----- Original Message ----- >> > >> > From: "Chiradeep Vittal" <chiradeep.vit...@citrix.com> >> > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org >> > Sent: Tuesday, October 1, 2013 4:45:56 PM >> > Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] Service monitoring tool in virtual router >> > >> > Got it. Any other OSS tool out there similar to monit? >> > >> > On 10/1/13 8:24 AM, "David Nalley" <da...@gnsa.us> wrote: >> > >> >> On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 1:27 AM, Chiradeep Vittal >> >> <chiradeep.vit...@citrix.com> wrote: >> >>> SNMP wouldn't restart a failed process nor would it generate alerts. >> It >> >>> is >> >>> simply too generic for the requirements outlined here. The proposal >> does >> >>> not talk about modifying monit, just using it. That wouldn't trigger >> the >> >>> AGPL. >> >> >> >> Let me restate my objection to anything AGPL. >> >> People are largely comfortable with GPLv2 software - Linux is >> >> ubiquitous. Many legal departments routinely prohibit GPLv3 software >> >> (we actually saw this when CS was GPLv3 licensed.) But the Affero GPL >> >> license is anathema in many corporate environments, and by forcing it >> >> on folks in the default System VM I fear it will hurt adoption of >> >> CloudStack. >> >> >> >> --David >> > >> > >> >> >
