+1. We should get a call out to the community to see who is expecting to merge for 4.3. Although 10/31 is the feature freeze date, proposals and branches should be in already IMHO.
On 10/8/13 9:54 AM, "Chip Childers" <chip.child...@sungard.com> wrote: >On Tue, Oct 08, 2013 at 04:49:24PM +0000, Animesh Chaturvedi wrote: >> >> > Whomever wants to take the lead for 4.3 should probably (IMO), start a >> > discussion on (1) coordination of work and >> [Animesh>] Since we are getting closer to code freeze date and we >>cannot find overall release management I can pick up 4.3 and call out >>the roles and ask for volunteers for them. > >Sounds good. > >> >> (2) re-thinking the schedule >> > to reset based on both historic performance and reality of the >>calendar >> > (we've really been working on 4.2 when we should have moved on to >>4.3). >> [Animesh>] Chip my preference would be to stick to the timeline of 4.3 >>which will make it a smaller release but will give us the opportunity to >>clear up our technical debt. > >+1 to being smaller and tech-debt focused. > >-chip
