You could start by trying to ping them from mgmt server, or trying to VNC
to them if the OS isn't up. I'm assuming you prepped a current system vm
template (maybe you're even reusing a secondary storage). If you can ping
their 169.254 addresses, you can "cloudstack-ssh 169.254.x.x" as root on
the kvm host to get in
On Oct 8, 2013 7:31 PM, "Mike Tutkowski" <mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com>
wrote:

> Looks like I'll have to dig up that doc on debugging SSVM...it's been
> about 30 mins since the VMs came up.
>
>
> On Tue, Oct 8, 2013 at 7:29 PM, Marcus Sorensen <shadow...@gmail.com>wrote:
>
>> You may just have to wait a bit. That means the VMS are started but the
>> services aren't up. Usually takes 5-10 min to get both up in my fusion vm.
>> If that doesn't get better you may have to log into the system VMS and see
>> what's going on.
>>  On Oct 8, 2013 7:25 PM, "Mike Tutkowski" <mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Doh! I didn't restart the necessary service after exporting my NFS share.
>>>
>>> The system VMs come up now; however, SSVM has a dash (-) for its Agent
>>> State and the CS MS console keeps printing out the following:
>>>
>>> INFO  [o.a.c.s.e.DefaultEndPointSelector]
>>> (StatsCollector-3:ctx-018adc41) No running ssvm is found, so command will
>>> be sent to LocalHostEndPoint
>>>
>>>
>>> On Tue, Oct 8, 2013 at 4:35 PM, Marcus Sorensen <shadow...@gmail.com>wrote:
>>>
>>>> Can you mount the secondary storage from your KVM host?
>>>> On Oct 8, 2013 4:01 PM, "Mike Tutkowski" <mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Although the host is added to KVM, I do see the following issues in
>>>>> the CS MS console (any thoughts on this?):
>>>>>
>>>>> WARN  [c.c.u.d.Merovingian2] (secstorage-1:ctx-c1c573ee) Was unable to
>>>>> find lock for the key template_spool_ref2 and thread id 2049868806
>>>>> INFO  [c.c.v.VirtualMachineManagerImpl] (secstorage-1:ctx-c1c573ee)
>>>>> Unable to contact resource.
>>>>> com.cloud.exception.StorageUnavailableException: Resource
>>>>> [StoragePool:1] is unreachable: Unable to create
>>>>> Vol[1|vm=1|ROOT]:com.cloud.utils.exception.CloudRuntimeException:
>>>>> org.libvirt.LibvirtException: internal error Child process (/bin/mount
>>>>> 192.168.233.10:/mnt/secondary/template/tmpl/1/3
>>>>> /mnt/334b3c4e-764b-362a-be2c-ebe8c490d0a9) status unexpected: exit status 
>>>>> 32
>>>>>  at
>>>>> org.apache.cloudstack.engine.orchestration.VolumeOrchestrator.recreateVolume(VolumeOrchestrator.java:1027)
>>>>> at
>>>>> org.apache.cloudstack.engine.orchestration.VolumeOrchestrator.prepare(VolumeOrchestrator.java:1069)
>>>>>  at
>>>>> com.cloud.vm.VirtualMachineManagerImpl.advanceStart(VirtualMachineManagerImpl.java:830)
>>>>> at
>>>>> com.cloud.vm.VirtualMachineManagerImpl.advanceStart(VirtualMachineManagerImpl.java:649)
>>>>>  at
>>>>> com.cloud.storage.secondary.SecondaryStorageManagerImpl.startSecStorageVm(SecondaryStorageManagerImpl.java:261)
>>>>> at
>>>>> com.cloud.storage.secondary.SecondaryStorageManagerImpl.allocCapacity(SecondaryStorageManagerImpl.java:693)
>>>>>  at
>>>>> com.cloud.storage.secondary.SecondaryStorageManagerImpl.expandPool(SecondaryStorageManagerImpl.java:1265)
>>>>> at
>>>>> com.cloud.secstorage.PremiumSecondaryStorageManagerImpl.scanPool(PremiumSecondaryStorageManagerImpl.java:123)
>>>>>  at
>>>>> com.cloud.secstorage.PremiumSecondaryStorageManagerImpl.scanPool(PremiumSecondaryStorageManagerImpl.java:50)
>>>>> at
>>>>> com.cloud.vm.SystemVmLoadScanner.loadScan(SystemVmLoadScanner.java:101)
>>>>>  at
>>>>> com.cloud.vm.SystemVmLoadScanner.access$100(SystemVmLoadScanner.java:33)
>>>>> at
>>>>> com.cloud.vm.SystemVmLoadScanner$1.reallyRun(SystemVmLoadScanner.java:78)
>>>>>  at
>>>>> com.cloud.vm.SystemVmLoadScanner$1.runInContext(SystemVmLoadScanner.java:71)
>>>>> at
>>>>> org.apache.cloudstack.managed.context.ManagedContextRunnable$1.run(ManagedContextRunnable.java:49)
>>>>>  at
>>>>> org.apache.cloudstack.managed.context.impl.DefaultManagedContext$1.call(DefaultManagedContext.java:56)
>>>>> at
>>>>> org.apache.cloudstack.managed.context.impl.DefaultManagedContext.callWithContext(DefaultManagedContext.java:103)
>>>>>  at
>>>>> org.apache.cloudstack.managed.context.impl.DefaultManagedContext.runWithContext(DefaultManagedContext.java:53)
>>>>> at
>>>>> org.apache.cloudstack.managed.context.ManagedContextRunnable.run(ManagedContextRunnable.java:46)
>>>>>  at
>>>>> java.util.concurrent.Executors$RunnableAdapter.call(Executors.java:471)
>>>>> at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.runAndReset(FutureTask.java:304)
>>>>>  at
>>>>> java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor$ScheduledFutureTask.access$301(ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor.java:178)
>>>>> at
>>>>> java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor$ScheduledFutureTask.run(ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor.java:293)
>>>>>  at
>>>>> java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1145)
>>>>> at
>>>>> java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:615)
>>>>>  at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:724)
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Tue, Oct 8, 2013 at 3:58 PM, Mike Tutkowski <
>>>>> mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> So...got some good news:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I spent a couple hours setting up a KVM environment on Ubuntu 12.04.1
>>>>>> from scratch (Installing SSH, Open iSCSI, Java 7, KVM, Git, CloudStack,
>>>>>> CloudStack DEBs, KVM system template, etc.) and I can now add this KVM 
>>>>>> host
>>>>>> to CloudStack (on a related note, no errors in agent.err either).
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I have no idea what is messed up with my old KVM install on Ubuntu,
>>>>>> but the new one works.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> That being the case, I can close out the JIRA ticket I logged a while
>>>>>> back and start integrating your code into mine.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Mon, Oct 7, 2013 at 7:46 PM, Mike Tutkowski <
>>>>>> mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Right...yeah, I didn't mean we'd commit to 4.2, but maybe I should
>>>>>>> work off of 4.2 since master seems to be un-stable in this regard.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I plan to set up a machine in the lab tomorrow with Ubuntu 12.04
>>>>>>> from scratch to see if it works when I start clean, but - if it doesn't 
>>>>>>> - I
>>>>>>> should just use 4.2 for development.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Mon, Oct 7, 2013 at 7:05 PM, Marcus Sorensen <shadow...@gmail.com
>>>>>>> > wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> We can't. This patch will never see 4.2. You can still start
>>>>>>>> working on your plugin on 4.2, but the change represented by this 
>>>>>>>> patch can
>>>>>>>> only go into master.
>>>>>>>>  On Oct 7, 2013 5:01 PM, "Mike Tutkowski" <
>>>>>>>> mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> So, now that I'm getting back to this, do you think I should just
>>>>>>>>> try to make this work with 4.2 (like we originally talked about)?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I updated again from master, rebuilt, redeployed DEBs and still
>>>>>>>>> get this JNA error message:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> log4j:WARN No appenders could be found for logger
>>>>>>>>> (org.apache.commons.httpclient.params.DefaultHttpParams).
>>>>>>>>> log4j:WARN Please initialize the log4j system properly.
>>>>>>>>> log4j:WARN See
>>>>>>>>> http://logging.apache.org/log4j/1.2/faq.html#noconfig for more
>>>>>>>>> info.
>>>>>>>>> java.lang.reflect.InvocationTargetException
>>>>>>>>> at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
>>>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>>>> sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:57)
>>>>>>>>>  at
>>>>>>>>> sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
>>>>>>>>> at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:606)
>>>>>>>>>  at
>>>>>>>>> org.apache.commons.daemon.support.DaemonLoader.start(DaemonLoader.java:243)
>>>>>>>>> Caused by: java.lang.UnsatisfiedLinkError: Can't obtain
>>>>>>>>> updateLastError method for class com.sun.jna.Native
>>>>>>>>>  at com.sun.jna.Native.initIDs(Native Method)
>>>>>>>>> at com.sun.jna.Native.<clinit>(Native.java:139)
>>>>>>>>> at org.libvirt.jna.Libvirt.<clinit>(Unknown Source)
>>>>>>>>>  at org.libvirt.Library.<clinit>(Unknown Source)
>>>>>>>>> at org.libvirt.Connect.<init>(Unknown Source)
>>>>>>>>>  at
>>>>>>>>> com.cloud.hypervisor.kvm.resource.LibvirtConnection.getConnection(LibvirtConnection.java:44)
>>>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>>>> com.cloud.hypervisor.kvm.resource.LibvirtConnection.getConnection(LibvirtConnection.java:37)
>>>>>>>>>  at
>>>>>>>>> com.cloud.hypervisor.kvm.resource.LibvirtComputingResource.configure(LibvirtComputingResource.java:733)
>>>>>>>>> at com.cloud.agent.Agent.<init>(Agent.java:161)
>>>>>>>>>  at com.cloud.agent.AgentShell.launchAgent(AgentShell.java:415)
>>>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>>>> com.cloud.agent.AgentShell.launchAgentFromClassInfo(AgentShell.java:370)
>>>>>>>>>  at com.cloud.agent.AgentShell.launchAgent(AgentShell.java:351)
>>>>>>>>> at com.cloud.agent.AgentShell.start(AgentShell.java:448)
>>>>>>>>>  ... 5 more
>>>>>>>>> Cannot start daemon
>>>>>>>>> Service exit with a return value of 5
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Oct 7, 2013 at 2:31 PM, Mike Tutkowski <
>>>>>>>>> mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Sure, that's a good plan.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I'll get to it.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Oct 7, 2013 at 2:29 PM, Marcus Sorensen <
>>>>>>>>>> shadow...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> I know you mentioned you might need some minor changes to it, as
>>>>>>>>>>> well as other minor changes just for master (attach volume switched 
>>>>>>>>>>> to pool
>>>>>>>>>>> vs adapter or something). My hope was that you would be able to 
>>>>>>>>>>> send an
>>>>>>>>>>> update that works for your plugin on master, I'll test against 
>>>>>>>>>>> existing
>>>>>>>>>>> libvirtd storage and apply it.
>>>>>>>>>>>  On Oct 7, 2013 1:49 PM, "Mike Tutkowski" <
>>>>>>>>>>> mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>    This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
>>>>>>>>>>>> https://reviews.apache.org/r/14381/
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> This looks reasonable to me, Marcus.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> When do you think you might start the process of getting this into 
>>>>>>>>>>>> master?
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> - Mike Tutkowski
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> On September 30th, 2013, 5:14 p.m. UTC, Marcus Sorensen wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>   Review request for cloudstack, edison su and Mike Tutkowski.
>>>>>>>>>>>> By Marcus Sorensen.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> *Updated Sept. 30, 2013, 5:14 p.m.*
>>>>>>>>>>>>  *Repository: * cloudstack-git
>>>>>>>>>>>> Description
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> With custom storage plugins comes the need to prep the KVM host 
>>>>>>>>>>>> prior to utilizing the disks. e.g. an iscsi initiator needs to log 
>>>>>>>>>>>> into the target and scan for the lun before it can be used on the 
>>>>>>>>>>>> host. This patch is an example I developed against 4.2, minor 
>>>>>>>>>>>> changes may be necessary to apply to master, but I want to share 
>>>>>>>>>>>> with others who are working on storage so they can ensure it works 
>>>>>>>>>>>> for them. Please tweak as you see fit.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> MigrateCommand: pass vmTO object so we can see which disks/storage 
>>>>>>>>>>>> pool types belong to the vm when migrating a VM. This facilitates 
>>>>>>>>>>>> being able to call disconnectPhysicalDisksViaVmSpec
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> VirtualMachineManagerImpl: pass VirtualMachineTO when migrating so 
>>>>>>>>>>>> that we can see which disks belong to the VM and what storage 
>>>>>>>>>>>> pools/adaptors should be used
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> LibvirtComputingResource: add calls KVMStoragePoolManager's 
>>>>>>>>>>>> connectPhysicalDiskViaVmSpec and disconnectPhysicalDiskViaVmSpec 
>>>>>>>>>>>> calls where appropriate (when starting a vm, migrating a vm). 
>>>>>>>>>>>> Ensure that we create 'raw' format XML disk definitions when the 
>>>>>>>>>>>> storage format is RAW. Move cleanupDisk logic to storage adaptors 
>>>>>>>>>>>> so that each adaptor type can clean up its disks in is own way.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> KVMStoragePoolManager:  add connectPhysicalDisk, 
>>>>>>>>>>>> disconnectPhysicalDisk, connectPhysicalDiskViaVmSpec, 
>>>>>>>>>>>> disconnectPhysicalDiskViaVmSpec, disconnectPhysicalDiskByPath. 
>>>>>>>>>>>> These all call the specific StorageAdaptor's connectPhysicalDisk, 
>>>>>>>>>>>> disconnectPhysicalDisk, or disconnectPhysicalDiskByPath calls.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> KVMStorageProcessor: Call 
>>>>>>>>>>>> connectPhysicalDisk/disconnectPhysicalDisk on the storage adaptor. 
>>>>>>>>>>>> Whether or not this is implemented is up to the storage adaptor.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> LibvirtStorageAdaptor: implement dummy 
>>>>>>>>>>>> connectPhysicalDisk/disconnectPhysicalDisk, move cleanupDisk logic 
>>>>>>>>>>>> from LibvirtComputingResource to disconnectPhysicalDiskByPath
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> StorageAdaptor: define 
>>>>>>>>>>>> connectPhysicalDisk/disconnectPhysicalDisk/disconnectPhysicalDiskByPath
>>>>>>>>>>>>  in the interface
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>   Testing
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Basic testing with my storage adaptor
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>   Diffs
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>    - core/src/com/cloud/agent/api/MigrateCommand.java (5042b8c)
>>>>>>>>>>>>    - 
>>>>>>>>>>>> plugins/hypervisors/kvm/src/com/cloud/hypervisor/kvm/resource/LibvirtComputingResource.java
>>>>>>>>>>>>    (3ee811f)
>>>>>>>>>>>>    - 
>>>>>>>>>>>> plugins/hypervisors/kvm/src/com/cloud/hypervisor/kvm/storage/KVMStoragePoolManager.java
>>>>>>>>>>>>    (e09c9ba)
>>>>>>>>>>>>    - 
>>>>>>>>>>>> plugins/hypervisors/kvm/src/com/cloud/hypervisor/kvm/storage/KVMStorageProcessor.java
>>>>>>>>>>>>    (c69f9b0)
>>>>>>>>>>>>    - 
>>>>>>>>>>>> plugins/hypervisors/kvm/src/com/cloud/hypervisor/kvm/storage/LibvirtStorageAdaptor.java
>>>>>>>>>>>>    (123a9f1)
>>>>>>>>>>>>    - 
>>>>>>>>>>>> plugins/hypervisors/kvm/src/com/cloud/hypervisor/kvm/storage/StorageAdaptor.java
>>>>>>>>>>>>    (4956d8d)
>>>>>>>>>>>>    - server/src/com/cloud/vm/VirtualMachineManagerImpl.java
>>>>>>>>>>>>    (d46bbb0)
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> View Diff <https://reviews.apache.org/r/14381/diff/>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>> *Mike Tutkowski*
>>>>>>>>>> *Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.*
>>>>>>>>>> e: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
>>>>>>>>>> o: 303.746.7302
>>>>>>>>>> Advancing the way the world uses the 
>>>>>>>>>> cloud<http://solidfire.com/solution/overview/?video=play>
>>>>>>>>>> *™*
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>> *Mike Tutkowski*
>>>>>>>>> *Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.*
>>>>>>>>> e: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
>>>>>>>>> o: 303.746.7302
>>>>>>>>> Advancing the way the world uses the 
>>>>>>>>> cloud<http://solidfire.com/solution/overview/?video=play>
>>>>>>>>> *™*
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> *Mike Tutkowski*
>>>>>>> *Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.*
>>>>>>> e: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
>>>>>>> o: 303.746.7302
>>>>>>> Advancing the way the world uses the 
>>>>>>> cloud<http://solidfire.com/solution/overview/?video=play>
>>>>>>> *™*
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> *Mike Tutkowski*
>>>>>> *Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.*
>>>>>> e: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
>>>>>> o: 303.746.7302
>>>>>> Advancing the way the world uses the 
>>>>>> cloud<http://solidfire.com/solution/overview/?video=play>
>>>>>> *™*
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> *Mike Tutkowski*
>>>>> *Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.*
>>>>> e: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
>>>>> o: 303.746.7302
>>>>> Advancing the way the world uses the 
>>>>> cloud<http://solidfire.com/solution/overview/?video=play>
>>>>> *™*
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> *Mike Tutkowski*
>>> *Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.*
>>> e: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
>>> o: 303.746.7302
>>> Advancing the way the world uses the 
>>> cloud<http://solidfire.com/solution/overview/?video=play>
>>> *™*
>>>
>>
>
>
> --
> *Mike Tutkowski*
> *Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.*
> e: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
> o: 303.746.7302
> Advancing the way the world uses the 
> cloud<http://solidfire.com/solution/overview/?video=play>
> *™*
>

Reply via email to