Use my tiny centos image. I'm not sure what's up with that crufty old
default centos template.

Register this qcow2 template:
http://marcus.mlsorensen.com/cloudstack-extras/tiny-centos-63.qcow2

Needs a service offering with at least 192MB to run.
On Oct 8, 2013 11:36 PM, "Mike Tutkowski" <mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com>
wrote:

> Perhaps you might know something about this, Marcus.
>
> My instance suffers a Kernel panic while booting up.
>
> I'm just using the built-in KVM template (CentOS 5.5(64-bit) no GUI (KVM))
> with 1 CPU and 512 MB memory.
>
> http://i.imgur.com/QuPH2Ub.png
>
> I tried to just use an ISO instead, but apparently that functionality is
> broken, as well (related to Disk Offerings).
>
>
> On Tue, Oct 8, 2013 at 10:39 PM, Mike Tutkowski <
> mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com> wrote:
>
>> OK, all is good now.
>>
>> I have both system VMs up and running and the Agent States read as "Up,"
>> as well.
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Oct 8, 2013 at 9:50 PM, Mike Tutkowski <
>> mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com> wrote:
>>
>>> I believe we've been down this road before:
>>>
>>> 2013-10-09 03:47:41,281 ERROR [cloud.agent.AgentShell] (main:null)
>>> Unable to start agent: Resource class not found:
>>> com.cloud.storage.resource.PremiumSecondaryStorageResource due to:
>>> java.lang.ClassNotFoundException:
>>> com.cloud.storage.resource.PremiumSecondaryStorageResource
>>>
>>> The solution was to compile without -Dnoredist.
>>>
>>> I will try that now.
>>>
>>>
>>> On Tue, Oct 8, 2013 at 9:36 PM, Marcus Sorensen <shadow...@gmail.com>wrote:
>>>
>>>> You may be able to find a stack trace for the java process in
>>>> /var/log/cloud or the messages file, on the system vm.
>>>>  On Oct 8, 2013 9:21 PM, "Mike Tutkowski" <mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Interesting...I ran the following:
>>>>>
>>>>> /usr/local/cloud/systemvm/ssvm-check.sh
>>>>>
>>>>> It says the Java process is not running.
>>>>>
>>>>> This is the KVM system template I'm using:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> http://download.cloud.com/templates/4.2/systemvmtemplate-2013-06-12-master-kvm.qcow2.bz2
>>>>>
>>>>> I just picked the one that was referenced in the VM_Template table in
>>>>> 4.3.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Tue, Oct 8, 2013 at 9:05 PM, Mike Tutkowski <
>>>>> mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Found it.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> As an FYI, this is the doc I was referring to:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/SSVM%2C+templates%2C+Secondary+storage+troubleshooting
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Tue, Oct 8, 2013 at 9:04 PM, Mike Tutkowski <
>>>>>> mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> CS MS can ping the SSVM's public IP address.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> SSVM can ping CS MS.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>  I think we had a nice debug document for SSVM mentioned on a CS
>>>>>>> e-mail...I'll try to find it.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Tue, Oct 8, 2013 at 8:29 PM, Marcus Sorensen <shadow...@gmail.com
>>>>>>> > wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> You could start by trying to ping them from mgmt server, or trying
>>>>>>>> to VNC to them if the OS isn't up. I'm assuming you prepped a current
>>>>>>>> system vm template (maybe you're even reusing a secondary storage). If 
>>>>>>>> you
>>>>>>>> can ping their 169.254 addresses, you can "cloudstack-ssh 169.254.x.x" 
>>>>>>>> as
>>>>>>>> root on the kvm host to get in
>>>>>>>>  On Oct 8, 2013 7:31 PM, "Mike Tutkowski" <
>>>>>>>> mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Looks like I'll have to dig up that doc on debugging SSVM...it's
>>>>>>>>> been about 30 mins since the VMs came up.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Oct 8, 2013 at 7:29 PM, Marcus Sorensen <
>>>>>>>>> shadow...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> You may just have to wait a bit. That means the VMS are started
>>>>>>>>>> but the services aren't up. Usually takes 5-10 min to get both up in 
>>>>>>>>>> my
>>>>>>>>>> fusion vm. If that doesn't get better you may have to log into the 
>>>>>>>>>> system
>>>>>>>>>> VMS and see what's going on.
>>>>>>>>>>  On Oct 8, 2013 7:25 PM, "Mike Tutkowski" <
>>>>>>>>>> mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Doh! I didn't restart the necessary service after exporting my
>>>>>>>>>>> NFS share.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> The system VMs come up now; however, SSVM has a dash (-) for its
>>>>>>>>>>> Agent State and the CS MS console keeps printing out the following:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> INFO  [o.a.c.s.e.DefaultEndPointSelector]
>>>>>>>>>>> (StatsCollector-3:ctx-018adc41) No running ssvm is found, so 
>>>>>>>>>>> command will
>>>>>>>>>>> be sent to LocalHostEndPoint
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Oct 8, 2013 at 4:35 PM, Marcus Sorensen <
>>>>>>>>>>> shadow...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Can you mount the secondary storage from your KVM host?
>>>>>>>>>>>> On Oct 8, 2013 4:01 PM, "Mike Tutkowski" <
>>>>>>>>>>>> mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Although the host is added to KVM, I do see the following
>>>>>>>>>>>>> issues in the CS MS console (any thoughts on this?):
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> WARN  [c.c.u.d.Merovingian2] (secstorage-1:ctx-c1c573ee) Was
>>>>>>>>>>>>> unable to find lock for the key template_spool_ref2 and thread id
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2049868806
>>>>>>>>>>>>> INFO  [c.c.v.VirtualMachineManagerImpl]
>>>>>>>>>>>>> (secstorage-1:ctx-c1c573ee) Unable to contact resource.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> com.cloud.exception.StorageUnavailableException: Resource
>>>>>>>>>>>>> [StoragePool:1] is unreachable: Unable to create
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Vol[1|vm=1|ROOT]:com.cloud.utils.exception.CloudRuntimeException:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> org.libvirt.LibvirtException: internal error Child process 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> (/bin/mount
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 192.168.233.10:/mnt/secondary/template/tmpl/1/3
>>>>>>>>>>>>> /mnt/334b3c4e-764b-362a-be2c-ebe8c490d0a9) status unexpected: 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> exit status 32
>>>>>>>>>>>>>  at
>>>>>>>>>>>>> org.apache.cloudstack.engine.orchestration.VolumeOrchestrator.recreateVolume(VolumeOrchestrator.java:1027)
>>>>>>>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>>>>>>>> org.apache.cloudstack.engine.orchestration.VolumeOrchestrator.prepare(VolumeOrchestrator.java:1069)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>  at
>>>>>>>>>>>>> com.cloud.vm.VirtualMachineManagerImpl.advanceStart(VirtualMachineManagerImpl.java:830)
>>>>>>>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>>>>>>>> com.cloud.vm.VirtualMachineManagerImpl.advanceStart(VirtualMachineManagerImpl.java:649)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>  at
>>>>>>>>>>>>> com.cloud.storage.secondary.SecondaryStorageManagerImpl.startSecStorageVm(SecondaryStorageManagerImpl.java:261)
>>>>>>>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>>>>>>>> com.cloud.storage.secondary.SecondaryStorageManagerImpl.allocCapacity(SecondaryStorageManagerImpl.java:693)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>  at
>>>>>>>>>>>>> com.cloud.storage.secondary.SecondaryStorageManagerImpl.expandPool(SecondaryStorageManagerImpl.java:1265)
>>>>>>>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>>>>>>>> com.cloud.secstorage.PremiumSecondaryStorageManagerImpl.scanPool(PremiumSecondaryStorageManagerImpl.java:123)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>  at
>>>>>>>>>>>>> com.cloud.secstorage.PremiumSecondaryStorageManagerImpl.scanPool(PremiumSecondaryStorageManagerImpl.java:50)
>>>>>>>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>>>>>>>> com.cloud.vm.SystemVmLoadScanner.loadScan(SystemVmLoadScanner.java:101)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>  at
>>>>>>>>>>>>> com.cloud.vm.SystemVmLoadScanner.access$100(SystemVmLoadScanner.java:33)
>>>>>>>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>>>>>>>> com.cloud.vm.SystemVmLoadScanner$1.reallyRun(SystemVmLoadScanner.java:78)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>  at
>>>>>>>>>>>>> com.cloud.vm.SystemVmLoadScanner$1.runInContext(SystemVmLoadScanner.java:71)
>>>>>>>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>>>>>>>> org.apache.cloudstack.managed.context.ManagedContextRunnable$1.run(ManagedContextRunnable.java:49)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>  at
>>>>>>>>>>>>> org.apache.cloudstack.managed.context.impl.DefaultManagedContext$1.call(DefaultManagedContext.java:56)
>>>>>>>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>>>>>>>> org.apache.cloudstack.managed.context.impl.DefaultManagedContext.callWithContext(DefaultManagedContext.java:103)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>  at
>>>>>>>>>>>>> org.apache.cloudstack.managed.context.impl.DefaultManagedContext.runWithContext(DefaultManagedContext.java:53)
>>>>>>>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>>>>>>>> org.apache.cloudstack.managed.context.ManagedContextRunnable.run(ManagedContextRunnable.java:46)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>  at
>>>>>>>>>>>>> java.util.concurrent.Executors$RunnableAdapter.call(Executors.java:471)
>>>>>>>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>>>>>>>> java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.runAndReset(FutureTask.java:304)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>  at
>>>>>>>>>>>>> java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor$ScheduledFutureTask.access$301(ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor.java:178)
>>>>>>>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>>>>>>>> java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor$ScheduledFutureTask.run(ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor.java:293)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>  at
>>>>>>>>>>>>> java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1145)
>>>>>>>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>>>>>>>> java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:615)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>  at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:724)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Oct 8, 2013 at 3:58 PM, Mike Tutkowski <
>>>>>>>>>>>>> mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So...got some good news:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I spent a couple hours setting up a KVM environment on Ubuntu
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 12.04.1 from scratch (Installing SSH, Open iSCSI, Java 7, KVM, 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Git,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> CloudStack, CloudStack DEBs, KVM system template, etc.) and I 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> can now add
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> this KVM host to CloudStack (on a related note, no errors in 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> agent.err
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> either).
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I have no idea what is messed up with my old KVM install on
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ubuntu, but the new one works.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> That being the case, I can close out the JIRA ticket I logged
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a while back and start integrating your code into mine.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Oct 7, 2013 at 7:46 PM, Mike Tutkowski <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Right...yeah, I didn't mean we'd commit to 4.2, but maybe I
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> should work off of 4.2 since master seems to be un-stable in 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> this regard.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I plan to set up a machine in the lab tomorrow with Ubuntu
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 12.04 from scratch to see if it works when I start clean, but - 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> if it
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> doesn't - I should just use 4.2 for development.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Oct 7, 2013 at 7:05 PM, Marcus Sorensen <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> shadow...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> We can't. This patch will never see 4.2. You can still
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> start working on your plugin on 4.2, but the change 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> represented by this
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> patch can only go into master.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>  On Oct 7, 2013 5:01 PM, "Mike Tutkowski" <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So, now that I'm getting back to this, do you think I
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> should just try to make this work with 4.2 (like we 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> originally talked
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> about)?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I updated again from master, rebuilt, redeployed DEBs and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> still get this JNA error message:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> log4j:WARN No appenders could be found for logger
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (org.apache.commons.httpclient.params.DefaultHttpParams).
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> log4j:WARN Please initialize the log4j system properly.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> log4j:WARN See
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://logging.apache.org/log4j/1.2/faq.html#noconfig for
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> more info.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> java.lang.reflect.InvocationTargetException
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Method)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:57)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>  at
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:606)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>  at
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> org.apache.commons.daemon.support.DaemonLoader.start(DaemonLoader.java:243)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Caused by: java.lang.UnsatisfiedLinkError: Can't obtain
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> updateLastError method for class com.sun.jna.Native
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>  at com.sun.jna.Native.initIDs(Native Method)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> at com.sun.jna.Native.<clinit>(Native.java:139)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> at org.libvirt.jna.Libvirt.<clinit>(Unknown Source)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>  at org.libvirt.Library.<clinit>(Unknown Source)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> at org.libvirt.Connect.<init>(Unknown Source)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>  at
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> com.cloud.hypervisor.kvm.resource.LibvirtConnection.getConnection(LibvirtConnection.java:44)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> com.cloud.hypervisor.kvm.resource.LibvirtConnection.getConnection(LibvirtConnection.java:37)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>  at
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> com.cloud.hypervisor.kvm.resource.LibvirtComputingResource.configure(LibvirtComputingResource.java:733)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> at com.cloud.agent.Agent.<init>(Agent.java:161)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>  at
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> com.cloud.agent.AgentShell.launchAgent(AgentShell.java:415)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> com.cloud.agent.AgentShell.launchAgentFromClassInfo(AgentShell.java:370)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>  at
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> com.cloud.agent.AgentShell.launchAgent(AgentShell.java:351)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> at com.cloud.agent.AgentShell.start(AgentShell.java:448)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>  ... 5 more
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Cannot start daemon
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Service exit with a return value of 5
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Oct 7, 2013 at 2:31 PM, Mike Tutkowski <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sure, that's a good plan.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'll get to it.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Oct 7, 2013 at 2:29 PM, Marcus Sorensen <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> shadow...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I know you mentioned you might need some minor changes
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to it, as well as other minor changes just for master 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (attach volume
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> switched to pool vs adapter or something). My hope was that 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you would be
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> able to send an update that works for your plugin on 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> master, I'll test
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> against existing libvirtd storage and apply it.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>  On Oct 7, 2013 1:49 PM, "Mike Tutkowski" <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>    This is an automatically generated e-mail. To
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/14381/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> This looks reasonable to me, Marcus.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> When do you think you might start the process of getting 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> this into master?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Mike Tutkowski
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On September 30th, 2013, 5:14 p.m. UTC, Marcus Sorensen
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   Review request for cloudstack, edison su and Mike
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Tutkowski.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> By Marcus Sorensen.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *Updated Sept. 30, 2013, 5:14 p.m.*
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>  *Repository: * cloudstack-git
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Description
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> With custom storage plugins comes the need to prep the KVM 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> host prior to utilizing the disks. e.g. an iscsi initiator 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> needs to log into the target and scan for the lun before 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it can be used on the host. This patch is an example I 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> developed against 4.2, minor changes may be necessary to 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> apply to master, but I want to share with others who are 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> working on storage so they can ensure it works for them. 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Please tweak as you see fit.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> MigrateCommand: pass vmTO object so we can see which 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> disks/storage pool types belong to the vm when migrating a 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> VM. This facilitates being able to call 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> disconnectPhysicalDisksViaVmSpec
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> VirtualMachineManagerImpl: pass VirtualMachineTO when 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> migrating so that we can see which disks belong to the VM 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and what storage pools/adaptors should be used
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> LibvirtComputingResource: add calls 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> KVMStoragePoolManager's connectPhysicalDiskViaVmSpec and 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> disconnectPhysicalDiskViaVmSpec calls where appropriate 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (when starting a vm, migrating a vm). Ensure that we 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> create 'raw' format XML disk definitions when the storage 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> format is RAW. Move cleanupDisk logic to storage adaptors 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> so that each adaptor type can clean up its disks in is own 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> way.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> KVMStoragePoolManager:  add connectPhysicalDisk, 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> disconnectPhysicalDisk, connectPhysicalDiskViaVmSpec, 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> disconnectPhysicalDiskViaVmSpec, 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> disconnectPhysicalDiskByPath. These all call the specific 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> StorageAdaptor's connectPhysicalDisk, 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> disconnectPhysicalDisk, or disconnectPhysicalDiskByPath 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> calls.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> KVMStorageProcessor: Call 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> connectPhysicalDisk/disconnectPhysicalDisk on the storage 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> adaptor. Whether or not this is implemented is up to the 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> storage adaptor.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> LibvirtStorageAdaptor: implement dummy 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> connectPhysicalDisk/disconnectPhysicalDisk, move 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cleanupDisk logic from LibvirtComputingResource to 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> disconnectPhysicalDiskByPath
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> StorageAdaptor: define 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> connectPhysicalDisk/disconnectPhysicalDisk/disconnectPhysicalDiskByPath
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>  in the interface
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   Testing
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Basic testing with my storage adaptor
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   Diffs
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>    - core/src/com/cloud/agent/api/MigrateCommand.java
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>    (5042b8c)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>    - 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> plugins/hypervisors/kvm/src/com/cloud/hypervisor/kvm/resource/LibvirtComputingResource.java
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>    (3ee811f)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>    - 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> plugins/hypervisors/kvm/src/com/cloud/hypervisor/kvm/storage/KVMStoragePoolManager.java
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>    (e09c9ba)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>    - 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> plugins/hypervisors/kvm/src/com/cloud/hypervisor/kvm/storage/KVMStorageProcessor.java
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>    (c69f9b0)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>    - 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> plugins/hypervisors/kvm/src/com/cloud/hypervisor/kvm/storage/LibvirtStorageAdaptor.java
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>    (123a9f1)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>    - 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> plugins/hypervisors/kvm/src/com/cloud/hypervisor/kvm/storage/StorageAdaptor.java
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>    (4956d8d)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>    - server/src/com/cloud/vm/VirtualMachineManagerImpl.java
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>    (d46bbb0)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> View Diff <https://reviews.apache.org/r/14381/diff/>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *Mike Tutkowski*
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.*
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> e: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> o: 303.746.7302
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Advancing the way the world uses the 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cloud<http://solidfire.com/solution/overview/?video=play>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *™*
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *Mike Tutkowski*
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.*
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> e: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> o: 303.746.7302
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Advancing the way the world uses the 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cloud<http://solidfire.com/solution/overview/?video=play>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *™*
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *Mike Tutkowski*
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.*
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> e: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> o: 303.746.7302
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Advancing the way the world uses the 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cloud<http://solidfire.com/solution/overview/?video=play>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *™*
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *Mike Tutkowski*
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.*
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> e: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> o: 303.746.7302
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Advancing the way the world uses the 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cloud<http://solidfire.com/solution/overview/?video=play>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *™*
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>>> *Mike Tutkowski*
>>>>>>>>>>>>> *Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.*
>>>>>>>>>>>>> e: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>> o: 303.746.7302
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Advancing the way the world uses the 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> cloud<http://solidfire.com/solution/overview/?video=play>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> *™*
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>> *Mike Tutkowski*
>>>>>>>>>>> *Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.*
>>>>>>>>>>> e: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
>>>>>>>>>>> o: 303.746.7302
>>>>>>>>>>> Advancing the way the world uses the 
>>>>>>>>>>> cloud<http://solidfire.com/solution/overview/?video=play>
>>>>>>>>>>> *™*
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>> *Mike Tutkowski*
>>>>>>>>> *Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.*
>>>>>>>>> e: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
>>>>>>>>> o: 303.746.7302
>>>>>>>>> Advancing the way the world uses the 
>>>>>>>>> cloud<http://solidfire.com/solution/overview/?video=play>
>>>>>>>>> *™*
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> *Mike Tutkowski*
>>>>>>> *Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.*
>>>>>>> e: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
>>>>>>> o: 303.746.7302
>>>>>>> Advancing the way the world uses the 
>>>>>>> cloud<http://solidfire.com/solution/overview/?video=play>
>>>>>>> *™*
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> *Mike Tutkowski*
>>>>>> *Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.*
>>>>>> e: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
>>>>>> o: 303.746.7302
>>>>>> Advancing the way the world uses the 
>>>>>> cloud<http://solidfire.com/solution/overview/?video=play>
>>>>>> *™*
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> *Mike Tutkowski*
>>>>> *Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.*
>>>>> e: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
>>>>> o: 303.746.7302
>>>>> Advancing the way the world uses the 
>>>>> cloud<http://solidfire.com/solution/overview/?video=play>
>>>>> *™*
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> *Mike Tutkowski*
>>> *Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.*
>>> e: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
>>> o: 303.746.7302
>>> Advancing the way the world uses the 
>>> cloud<http://solidfire.com/solution/overview/?video=play>
>>> *™*
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> *Mike Tutkowski*
>> *Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.*
>> e: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
>> o: 303.746.7302
>> Advancing the way the world uses the 
>> cloud<http://solidfire.com/solution/overview/?video=play>
>> *™*
>>
>
>
>
> --
> *Mike Tutkowski*
> *Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.*
> e: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
> o: 303.746.7302
> Advancing the way the world uses the 
> cloud<http://solidfire.com/solution/overview/?video=play>
> *™*
>

Reply via email to