On 13/11/13 4:11 am, "Chip Childers" <chipchild...@apache.org> wrote:

>On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 10:31:47PM +0000, Animesh Chaturvedi wrote:
>> 
>> The format of apache-cloudstack-4.2.1-src.tar.bz2.md5 doesn't match the
>>gpg output.
>> 
>> See this:
>> 
>> localhost :: /tmp/cloudstack >gpg --print-md MD5
>>apache-cloudstack-4.2.1-src.tar.bz2
>> apache-cloudstack-4.2.1-src.tar.bz2: AE BF B5 B5 91 24 8B 6D  27 6F 9D
>>35 C0 C3
>>                                      DD D5 localhost :: /tmp/cloudstack
>>>cat apache-cloudstack-4.2.1-src.tar.bz2.md5
>> apache-cloudstack-4.2.1-src.tar.bz2: AE BF B5
>>                                      B5 91 24
>>                                      8B 6D  27
>>                                      6F 9D 35
>>                                      C0 C3 DD
>>                                      D5
>> 
>> There are extra line breaks in the .md5 file [1].  Although I'd
>>actually prefer to get the process to switch to the md5sum tool's format
>>anyway, can you correct this formatting before we continue with the
>>release voting?
>> 
>> -chip
>> 
>> [1] 
>>https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.2.1/apache-cloudstack
>>-4.2.1-src.tar.bz2.md5
>> 
>> Animesh> Chip, Abhi is in a different time zone so will see this in
>>morning, the SHA and MD5 are generated by build_asf.sh  script so if
>>this is an issue, should have been for prior releases also. Are you
>>suggesting to update the build_asf.sh to file to fix the formatting?
>> 
>>
>
>This must be an issue with local gpg output formatting.  Weird.
>
>Let's go forward with the vote.  Manual inspection shows it as matching.
>For 4.3, we should change the build script to use native md5sum and
>sha256sum (with a script fix to get around the mac installations that
>may have the commands pre-pended with a "g").
>
>I'll finish my testing and move forward with voting shortly.
>
I followed the release procedure and then did validation on signature etc
using the Release test procedure wiki.
Let me know if there are any further issues will be around to rectify.

-abhi
>

Reply via email to