May be a silly question, but why not just add "powered by" the existing logo?
Regards, Kirk Jantzer http://about.me/kirkjantzer On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 2:06 PM, David Nalley <da...@gnsa.us> wrote: > Awesome!!! Thanks! > > Not really - sooner is generally better than later, but getting it > done is better than not. > > --David > > On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 2:03 PM, Laszlo Hornyak > <laszlo.horn...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Not that I have great graphical skills, but I will give it a try to see > if > > I can compete with the pros :-) > > Are there any deadlines? > > > > On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 6:56 PM, David Nalley <da...@gnsa.us> wrote: > > > >> Hi folks: > >> > >> If you happen to have some graphical design talent (I have none) I > >> have a great opportunity for you :) > >> > >> CloudStack needs a 'powered by' logo that is easy to consume, and is > >> also attractive. > >> > >> A couple examples of powered by logos: > >> > >> http://tomcat.apache.org/images/tomcat-power.gif > >> > >> > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/download/attachments/80899/mahout-logo-poweredby-100.png?version=1&modificationDate=1312880703000 > >> > >> > https://netbeans.org/images_www/screenshots/6.0/baseIDE_ant_powered_150px.png > >> > >> A couple of constraints: > >> * Please don't use the Apache feather. (we could, but lets not; it > >> will make life simpler) > >> * Please try and produce a vector format as source (this allows us to > >> scale/etc) > >> * Because this will become a trademark (which is vastly different that > >> copyright) - we will likely need some explicit email agreement around > >> trademarks rights for the image. (I promise, it isn't as scary as that > >> sentence makes it out to be.) > >> > >> Anyone interested? > >> > >> --David > >> > > > > > > > > -- > > > > EOF >
