Radhika, if you already have info on how to do the upgrade to 4.2.1, can you commit it to the docs repo ? that we just need to review, test...
On Nov 16, 2013, at 8:42 AM, Radhika Puthiyetath <radhika.puthiyet...@citrix.com> wrote: > Hi > > I have not signed up for Upgrade. I read in the ML it is going to be taken up > during the hackathon at Collab Conf. > > -----Original Message----- > From: Marcus Sorensen [mailto:shadow...@gmail.com] > Sent: Thursday, November 14, 2013 11:45 PM > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Cc: Radhika Puthiyetath > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache CloudStack 4.2.1 > > Sorry, that should read 'unable to create VPCs'. > > On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 11:08 AM, Marcus Sorensen <shadow...@gmail.com> wrote: >> Yeah, I understand that 4.2.0 had a lot of post-release work needed. >> >> We are unable to create VPNs. This is reported second hand from one >> of my admins. He seems to think that it was caused by the following, >> which added a for loop inside a for loop. The error is: >> 'com.mysql.jdbc.exceptions.jdbc4.MySQLIntegrityConstraintViolationException: >> Duplicate entry '146-Lb' for key 'vpc_id' >> >> We did the following to fix it, something should be added to the sql upgrade. >> mysql -D cloud -t -e 'alter table vpc_service_map drop key vpc_id, add >> unique key vpc_id (vpc_id,service,provider)' >> >> >> commit 9050cfad3da673370d6ad1ed7570e31314069996 >> >> CLOUDSTACK-4704: 41-42 db upgrade - populate vpc_service_map table >> with the services/providers supported by VPC >> >> >> @Override >> @DB >> - public void persistVpcServiceProviders(long vpcId, Map<String, >> String> serviceProviderMap) { >> + public void persistVpcServiceProviders(long vpcId, Map<String, >> List<String>> serviceProviderMap) { >> Transaction txn = Transaction.currentTxn(); >> txn.start(); >> for (String service : serviceProviderMap.keySet()) { >> - VpcServiceMapVO serviceMap = new VpcServiceMapVO(vpcId, >> Network.Service.getService(service), >> Network.Provider.getProvider(serviceProviderMap.get(service))); >> - _vpcSvcMap.persist(serviceMap); >> + for (String provider : serviceProviderMap.get(service)) { >> + VpcServiceMapVO serviceMap = new >> VpcServiceMapVO(vpcId, Network.Service.getService(service), >> Network.Provider.getProvider(provider)); >> + _vpcSvcMap.persist(serviceMap); >> + } >> } >> txn.commit(); >> } >> >> >> On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 9:40 AM, Daan Hoogland <daan.hoogl...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >>> +1 binding (I had not been clear on this in this thread it seems) >>> >>> On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 6:05 AM, Abhinandan Prateek >>> <abhinandan.prat...@citrix.com> wrote: >>>> Marcus, >>>> >>>> Just summarising your concerns so that they can be followed upon: >>>> 1. Due to a VR script change a restart of VR is required. This >>>> should be noted down in upgrade instructions in RN. (Radhika to >>>> note) 2. For a maintenance release we should limit the scope to only >>>> blockers. I guess what is done is done probably for better as the >>>> main release had so many new features that a whole lot fixes were >>>> expected in the maintenance release. But again for further >>>> maintenance releases scope should be restricted to important fixes. >>>> >>>> Any other thing that has been missed ? >>>> >>>> -abhi >>>> >>>> >>>> On 14/11/13 12:06 am, "Marcus Sorensen" <shadow...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>> I'm unable to deploy virtual machines after upgrading an existing >>>>> 4.2.0 to this release. >>>>> >>>>> It looks like the file savepassword.sh was added at the end of >>>>> October as a virtual router script. This would likely mean that >>>>> people upgrading to 4.2.1 will need to upgrade/redeploy their >>>>> routers. I can verify that deploy works if I reboot the router. >>>>> >>>>> Looking over the current state of 4.2, I'm actually pretty surprised >>>>> at how much has changed. I'm seeing lots of whitespace fixes, >>>>> changes to interfaces, etc. My impression was that we'd only commit >>>>> fixes for blocker bugs once a release has gone production, only >>>>> touching it if we had to. This went pretty well with 4.1, I thought, >>>>> but everything was going through the RM that round. >>>>> >>>>> 2013-11-13 11:25:24,917 DEBUG >>>>> [resource.virtualnetwork.VirtualRoutingResource] >>>>> (agentRequest-Handler-2:null) Executing: >>>>> /usr/share/cloudstack-common/scripts/network/domr/router_proxy.sh >>>>> savepassword.sh 169.254.1.163 -v 10.2.4.116 -p fnirq_cnffjbeq >>>>> >>>>> 2013-11-13 11:25:25,000 DEBUG >>>>> [resource.virtualnetwork.VirtualRoutingResource] >>>>> (agentRequest-Handler-2:null) Exit value is 127 >>>>> >>>>> 2013-11-13 11:25:25,001 DEBUG >>>>> [resource.virtualnetwork.VirtualRoutingResource] >>>>> (agentRequest-Handler-2:null) bash: /opt/cloud/bin/savepassword.sh: >>>>> No such file or directory >>>>> >>>>> 2013-11-13 11:25:25,002 DEBUG [cloud.agent.Agent] >>>>> (agentRequest-Handler-2:null) Seq 21-289734823: { Ans: , MgmtId: >>>>> 90520732090445, via: 21, Ver: v1, Flags: 110, >>>>> [{"com.cloud.agent.api.Answer":{"result":false,"details":"Unable to >>>>> save password to >>>>> DomR.","wait":0}},{"com.cloud.agent.api.Answer":{"result":false,"details": >>>>> "Stopped >>>>> by previous failure","wait":0}}] } >>>>> >>>>> On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 10:26 AM, Chip Childers >>>>> <chipchild...@apache.org> >>>>> wrote: >>>>>> On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 10:52 AM, Abhinandan Prateek >>>>>> <abhinandan.prat...@citrix.com> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> This vote is to approve the current RC build for 4.2.1 >>>>>>> maintenance release. >>>>>>> For this particular release various upgrade paths have been >>>>>>> tested apart from regression tests and BVTs. >>>>>>> Around 175 bugs have been fixed some new features added (see CHANGES). >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Following are the particulars for this release: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlo >>>>>>> g;h=re >>>>>>> fs/heads/4.2 >>>>>>> commit: 0b9eadaf14513f5c72de672963b0e2f12ee7206f >>>>>>> >>>>>>> List of changes: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=blob_pl >>>>>>> ain;f= >>>>>>> CHANGES;hb=4.2.1 >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Source release revision 3492 (checksums and signatures are >>>>>>> available at the same location): >>>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.2.1/ >>>>>>> >>>>>>> PGP release keys (signed using RSA Key ID = 42443AA1): >>>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Vote will be open for 72 hours (until 11/15 End of day PST). >>>>>>> >>>>>>> For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure >>>>>>> to indicate "(binding)" with their vote? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> [ ] +1 approve >>>>>>> [ ] +0 no opinion >>>>>>> [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why) >>>>>> >>>>>> +1 (binding) >>>>>> >>>>>> I only performed very rudimentary functional testing, but the >>>>>> artifact's look legit. >>>>>> >>>>>> Thanks for doing this Abhi! >>>>
