I have some (limited) experience, it seems the fs[1] refered in this thread is good enough if you need to expose data. How much of this is being implemented at the moment?
I suppose you need to design a way for leveraging data from components, do you? i.e. the monitoriing service from Chiradeeps picture[2] Daan [1] https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/FS+for+Integrating+CS+alerts+via+SNMP+to+external+management+system [2] https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Autoscale+framework On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 11:36 AM, Nguyen Anh Tu <t...@apache.org> wrote: > Anyone can help in SNMP monitoring design? I have very limit experience > with SNMP :-) > > Thanks, > > --Tuna > > > On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 11:31 AM, Vijay Venkatachalam < > vijay.venkatacha...@citrix.com> wrote: > >> Hi Chiradeep, >> The monitoring service seems to be collecting statistics using >> polling and >> triggers actions during threshold breach. This seems to be very >> tasking. >> Can it be designed to listen for events on threshold breach as >> well? >> For ex. a configuration "response timeout > 30 ms" on a VIP can be >> sent to LB appliance, the LB appliance can intimate the Monitoring >> service >> when the threshold breach has happened. Basically offloading the >> responsibility. >> Thanks, >> Vijay V. >> >> >> > -----Original Message----- >> > From: Chiradeep Vittal [mailto:chiradeep.vit...@citrix.com] >> > Sent: Tuesday, November 26, 2013 8:07 AM >> > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org >> > Subject: Re: [Discuss] AutoScaling.next in CloudStack >> > >> > Hi Tuna, >> > >> > I boldly diagrammed out what we talked about here: >> > >> > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/x/M6YTAg >> > >> > The idea is to keep the monitoring part separate from the autoscale >> decision. >> > So, the monitoring can be SNMP/RRD/whatever. >> > >> > Scale-up using reconfiguration then becomes a mere matter of modifying >> the >> > autoscale service. >> > >> > >> > On 11/25/13 8:57 AM, "tuna" <ng.t...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > >> > >Hi guys, >> > > >> > >At CCCEU13 I talked about the AutoScale without NetScaler feature >> > >working with XenServer & XCP. For anyone don¹t know about this feature, >> > >take a look into my slide here: >> > >http://www.slideshare.net/tuna20073882/autoscale-without- >> > netscalerccceu13. >> > > >> > >Chiradeep and I had a short talk after the presentation about how to >> > >improve the AutoScale feature in future. We agreed that: >> > > >> > >+ Need to remove Load Balancing feature from AutoScaling. That¹s very >> > >simple to do. >> > >+ Need to use SNMP for monitoring not only instance-level but also >> > >application-level. >> > >+ Also, supporting well KVM hypervisor >> > > >> > >So, I blow up this thread for all of you guys to discuss the way we >> > >design that feature, such as: >> > >+ technical side, how to integrate effectively SNMP into CLoudStack. >> > >Where do we put SNMP monitor components into infrastructure? etc >> > >+ user experience, how user configure that feature with SNMP monitoring. >> > >I image that user can figure out they need AutoScale for which of >> > >following items: application, protocol (tcp, udp), port, bandwidth, >> > >disk, cpu and memory also, etc >> > >+ How about autoscale action, not just only deploy or destroy VM, we >> > >+ need >> > >maybe dynamically increase-decrease memory/cpu, nic bandwidth, disk,Š >> > > >> > >Personally, we should think about a completely autoscaling feature. >> > > >> > >Cheers, >> > > >> > >‹Tuna >> >>
