No, let me try that now. Thanks
On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 1:22 PM, John Kinsella <j...@stratosec.co> wrote: > Did you re-run mvn -P deps? > > On Feb 25, 2014, at 12:16 PM, Mike Tutkowski <mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com > <mailto:mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com>> wrote: > > I'm still getting the following error: > > ERROR [c.c.u.d.Merovingian2] (main:null) Unable to get a new db connection > java.sql.SQLException: No suitable driver found for > > jdbc:mysql://localhost:3306/cloud?autoReconnect=true&prepStmtCacheSize=517&cachePrepStmts=true > > I built using "mvn -P developer,systemvm clean install" and ran the > management server using "mvn -pl client jetty:run". > > Any thoughts on that? > > Thanks > > > On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 1:10 PM, John Kinsella <j...@stratosec.co<mailto: > j...@stratosec.co>> wrote: > > Yep that works - thanks! Will close 6157. > > On Feb 25, 2014, at 3:33 AM, Hugo Trippaers <h...@trippaers.nl<mailto: > h...@trippaers.nl><mailto: > h...@trippaers.nl<mailto:h...@trippaers.nl>>> wrote: > > Heya, > > Just pushed a change that will make the database work again. :-) > > > @Alex. The mysql jar used to be pulled in as a dependency from > framework-db. As the client target is responsible for building the war file > for the packages including this in the client pom would also put it in the > war file and in the packages. > > I think i have an elegant solution, its now included as a dependency for > both the database deploy and the jetty:run target. Which makes it > effectively a "provided" library for the purpose of our maven build. See > commit 8e6b86ae23dce802044388c5420ff61511d7115b and > e883877c7a6f9df04b572afd4ee5f10d265bcc3a. > > I can deploy a database and start the jetty:run target now without any > trouble (at least not more trouble than usual ;-) ) > > My next step is to clean up some of the dependencies. I think that only > cloud-framework-db should have a provided dependency on mysql. It's the > only piece of source code that actually needs the mysql driver to be > present during compilation for the optional HA configuration. There are > some test classes that depend on database functionally but those should be > moved to an integration test profile that could include the database > driver, those tests are disabled anyway so they don't cause any trouble > now. > > > Cheers, > > Hugo > > On 25 feb. 2014, at 06:39, Rajani Karuturi <rajani.karut...@citrix.com > <mailto:rajani.karut...@citrix.com> > <mailto:rajani.karut...@citrix.com>> wrote: > > Can we move the mysql-connector-java dependency to the parent > POM(SOURCE-ROOT/pom.xml) and define it different scopes for each profile? > > ie) > > > <profile> > <id>developer</id> > <dependencies> > <dependency> > <groupId>mysql</groupId> > <artifactId>mysql-connector-java</artifactId> > <scope>compile</scope> > </dependency> > </dependencies> > </profile> > <profile> > <id>production</id> > <dependencies> > <dependency> > <groupId>mysql</groupId> > <artifactId>mysql-connector-java</artifactId> > <scope>provided</scope> > </dependency> > </dependencies> > </profile> > > Thanks, > ~Rajani > > > > On 24-Feb-2014, at 11:41 pm, Hugo Trippaers <trip...@gmail.com<mailto: > trip...@gmail.com><mailto: > trip...@gmail.com<mailto:trip...@gmail.com>><mailto:trip...@gmail.com>> > wrote: > > Indeed, > > I've been fighting with maven all day to get the development profile to > include MySql. No luck yet, will give it another shot tomorrow :-) > > Hugo > > Sent from my iPhone > > On 24 feb. 2014, at 18:21, David Nalley <da...@gnsa.us<mailto: > da...@gnsa.us><mailto: > da...@gnsa.us<mailto:da...@gnsa.us>><mailto:da...@gnsa.us>> wrote: > > So it should be ok to include the jar in non-default builds. developer > and deploydb are not what we'd expect a normal user to consume. > (Anyone else's head spinning?) > > --David > > On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 11:44 AM, John Kinsella <j...@stratosec.co<mailto: > j...@stratosec.co><mailto: > j...@stratosec.co<mailto:j...@stratosec.co>><mailto:j...@stratosec.co>> > wrote: > I created CLOUDSTACK-6157 over the weekend to track this. Not sure adding > the jar after compile will help the deploydb target, but will give it a try > this morning. > > Could we set up the pom.xmls to use the jar for execution if it's found in > the user/system classpaths while respecting the legal requirements? > > Rayees' suggestion for cloud.spec makes sense for the RPM builds, but > doesn't affect the developer issues. > > -He who needs more maven experience > > On Feb 24, 2014, at 7:36 AM, Hugo Trippaers <h...@trippaers.nl<mailto: > h...@trippaers.nl><mailto: > h...@trippaers.nl<mailto:h...@trippaers.nl>><mailto:h...@trippaers.nl>> > wrote: > > Heya, > > as the mysql dependency is now set to provided in all the poms to fix our > license compliancy the jetty target and the deployed targets are not > working. > > I'm trying to configure an optional profile to enable those targets to > include the mysql dependency while executing, but so far no luck. If anyone > has some bright ideas on how to do this i'm all ears. In the meantime the > best solutions i've found to continue working is to copy the mysql jar file > into the directory > client/target/cloud-client-ui-4.4.0-SNAPSHOT/WEB-INF/lib/ by hand after > running mvm install and before running the jetty target (just don't run mvn > clean). > > Hopefully a better solution in the near future. > > Cheers, > > Hugo > > > > > > Stratosec<http://stratosec.co/> - Compliance as a Service > o: 415.315.9385 > @johnlkinsella<http://twitter.com/johnlkinsella> > > > > > -- > *Mike Tutkowski* > *Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.* > e: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com<mailto:mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com> > o: 303.746.7302 > Advancing the way the world uses the > cloud<http://solidfire.com/solution/overview/?video=play> > *(tm)* > > Stratosec<http://stratosec.co/> - Compliance as a Service > o: 415.315.9385 > @johnlkinsella<http://twitter.com/johnlkinsella> > > -- *Mike Tutkowski* *Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.* e: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com o: 303.746.7302 Advancing the way the world uses the cloud<http://solidfire.com/solution/overview/?video=play> *(tm)*
