People, There are several features in the API that different people want to revise.
1 the calls that use sensitive data using a http-get. When security is needed this hurts and should be disabled (being by configuration or altogether) 2 list* API calls interpret the name parameter in a non-consistent way. some use "name = <name>" others use "name like '%<name>%'" 3 the way maps and lists are passed is not standard and has different implementations. these are just the examples from the top of my head. There are bound to be others. It seems to me it is time to start work on a definition of how the 5.0 API should look. any takers? -- Daan
